中国卫生标准管理
中國衛生標準管理
중국위생표준관리
CHINA HEALTH STANDARD MANAGEMENT
2015年
2期
172-173
,共2页
腹腔镜%开腹%直肠癌根治术%临床疗效
腹腔鏡%開腹%直腸癌根治術%臨床療效
복강경%개복%직장암근치술%림상료효
Laparoscopy%Open surgery%Radical rectal cancer surgery%Clinical effect
目的：分析腹腔镜手术与传统开腹手术治疗直肠癌的临床疗效。方法选取2011年10月至2013年10月于本院进行治疗的108例直肠癌患者，分为对照组（开腹组）和观察组（腹腔镜组）各54例，比较两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、肛门排气时间、住院时间及1年生存率，分析两种直肠癌根治术的临床疗效。结果观察组患者手术时间显著长于对照组，而术中出血量，肛门排气时间和住院时间均显著短于对照组，P＜0.05，差异具有统计学意义。1年生存率比较两组无显著差异。结论腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的临床疗效显著，值得临床推广应用。
目的：分析腹腔鏡手術與傳統開腹手術治療直腸癌的臨床療效。方法選取2011年10月至2013年10月于本院進行治療的108例直腸癌患者，分為對照組（開腹組）和觀察組（腹腔鏡組）各54例，比較兩組患者的手術時間、術中齣血量、肛門排氣時間、住院時間及1年生存率，分析兩種直腸癌根治術的臨床療效。結果觀察組患者手術時間顯著長于對照組，而術中齣血量，肛門排氣時間和住院時間均顯著短于對照組，P＜0.05，差異具有統計學意義。1年生存率比較兩組無顯著差異。結論腹腔鏡直腸癌根治術的臨床療效顯著，值得臨床推廣應用。
목적：분석복강경수술여전통개복수술치료직장암적림상료효。방법선취2011년10월지2013년10월우본원진행치료적108례직장암환자，분위대조조（개복조）화관찰조（복강경조）각54례，비교량조환자적수술시간、술중출혈량、항문배기시간、주원시간급1년생존솔，분석량충직장암근치술적림상료효。결과관찰조환자수술시간현저장우대조조，이술중출혈량，항문배기시간화주원시간균현저단우대조조，P＜0.05，차이구유통계학의의。1년생존솔비교량조무현저차이。결론복강경직장암근치술적림상료효현저，치득림상추엄응용。
Objective To analyze the effect of laparoscopic surgery and traditional open surgery for the treatment of rectal cancer.Methods From October, 2011 to October 2013, 108 patients with rectal cancer were divided into control group (open surgery group, n=54) and observation group (laparoscopic surgery group,n=54). The surgery time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, anal exhaust time and 1 year survival rate were compared. The curative effects of two kinds of radical surgeries were analyzed. ResultsInobservation group, the surgery time was significantly longer than the control group, intraoperative blood loss, anal exhaust time and length of hospital stay were significantly shorter than the control group,P<0.05, there was statistical significance. There was no significant difference for 1 year survival rate in two groups.ConclusionThe clinical effect of laparoscopic radical surgery for rectal cancer was significant. It is worth clinical application.
