磁共振成像
磁共振成像
자공진성상
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
2015年
1期
27-32
,共6页
陈业晞%钟晓平%李志扬%蔡道全%吴仁华%沈智威
陳業晞%鐘曉平%李誌颺%蔡道全%吳仁華%瀋智威
진업희%종효평%리지양%채도전%오인화%침지위
乳腺肿瘤%磁共振成像%病变范围%病理学
乳腺腫瘤%磁共振成像%病變範圍%病理學
유선종류%자공진성상%병변범위%병이학
Breast neoplasms%Magnetic resonance imaging%Inifltration range%Pthology
目的评估MRI技术判定乳腺癌肿瘤边界的准确性,验证MRI技术在手术前判断乳腺癌浸润范围的价值。材料与方法新鲜乳腺离体标本17个,离体后迅速行MR扫描及病理检查,在7.0 T MR成像仪上采集乳腺癌离体样本的MR T1WI、T2WI和扩散加权成像(DWI)。通过VnmrJ 4.0计算出表观扩散系数像(ADC)及各向异性分数像(FA)。在VnmrJ 4.0软件上对DWI、ADC和FA图通过手工勾绘病变范围,并计算病变面积。在显微镜下标记病理切片的病变范围,通过Photoshop软件计算病变面积,最后比较上述图像的病变范围与病理染色切片的病变范围差异。结果在送检的乳腺癌标本中,经病理证实14例为乳腺浸润性导管癌,2例为乳头状癌,1例为黏液腺癌。结合不同序列的MRI可观察到乳腺肿瘤边缘的浸润范围。经过spss19.0软件分析,发现MR DWI、ADC及FA像的病变面积与病理标本浸润范围具有显著的相关性;DWI平均面积[(4.32±1.28) cm2]与病理平均面积[(3.81±1.12) cm2]比较,r=0.966,P<0.01;ADC平均面积[(4.68±1.43) cm2]与病理平均面积[(3.81±1.12) cm2]比较,r=0.976, P<0.01;FA平均面积[(4.74±1.53) cm2]与病理平均面积[(3.81±1.12) cm2]比较, r=0.964,P<0.01)。结论7.0 T MRI ADC图和FA图在评估肿瘤浸润范围具有更明显的价值,病变面积与病理结果有很高的相关性,可为乳腺癌术前病变范围评估提供重要的参考信息。
目的評估MRI技術判定乳腺癌腫瘤邊界的準確性,驗證MRI技術在手術前判斷乳腺癌浸潤範圍的價值。材料與方法新鮮乳腺離體標本17箇,離體後迅速行MR掃描及病理檢查,在7.0 T MR成像儀上採集乳腺癌離體樣本的MR T1WI、T2WI和擴散加權成像(DWI)。通過VnmrJ 4.0計算齣錶觀擴散繫數像(ADC)及各嚮異性分數像(FA)。在VnmrJ 4.0軟件上對DWI、ADC和FA圖通過手工勾繪病變範圍,併計算病變麵積。在顯微鏡下標記病理切片的病變範圍,通過Photoshop軟件計算病變麵積,最後比較上述圖像的病變範圍與病理染色切片的病變範圍差異。結果在送檢的乳腺癌標本中,經病理證實14例為乳腺浸潤性導管癌,2例為乳頭狀癌,1例為黏液腺癌。結閤不同序列的MRI可觀察到乳腺腫瘤邊緣的浸潤範圍。經過spss19.0軟件分析,髮現MR DWI、ADC及FA像的病變麵積與病理標本浸潤範圍具有顯著的相關性;DWI平均麵積[(4.32±1.28) cm2]與病理平均麵積[(3.81±1.12) cm2]比較,r=0.966,P<0.01;ADC平均麵積[(4.68±1.43) cm2]與病理平均麵積[(3.81±1.12) cm2]比較,r=0.976, P<0.01;FA平均麵積[(4.74±1.53) cm2]與病理平均麵積[(3.81±1.12) cm2]比較, r=0.964,P<0.01)。結論7.0 T MRI ADC圖和FA圖在評估腫瘤浸潤範圍具有更明顯的價值,病變麵積與病理結果有很高的相關性,可為乳腺癌術前病變範圍評估提供重要的參攷信息。
목적평고MRI기술판정유선암종류변계적준학성,험증MRI기술재수술전판단유선암침윤범위적개치。재료여방법신선유선리체표본17개,리체후신속행MR소묘급병리검사,재7.0 T MR성상의상채집유선암리체양본적MR T1WI、T2WI화확산가권성상(DWI)。통과VnmrJ 4.0계산출표관확산계수상(ADC)급각향이성분수상(FA)。재VnmrJ 4.0연건상대DWI、ADC화FA도통과수공구회병변범위,병계산병변면적。재현미경하표기병리절편적병변범위,통과Photoshop연건계산병변면적,최후비교상술도상적병변범위여병리염색절편적병변범위차이。결과재송검적유선암표본중,경병리증실14례위유선침윤성도관암,2례위유두상암,1례위점액선암。결합불동서렬적MRI가관찰도유선종류변연적침윤범위。경과spss19.0연건분석,발현MR DWI、ADC급FA상적병변면적여병리표본침윤범위구유현저적상관성;DWI평균면적[(4.32±1.28) cm2]여병리평균면적[(3.81±1.12) cm2]비교,r=0.966,P<0.01;ADC평균면적[(4.68±1.43) cm2]여병리평균면적[(3.81±1.12) cm2]비교,r=0.976, P<0.01;FA평균면적[(4.74±1.53) cm2]여병리평균면적[(3.81±1.12) cm2]비교, r=0.964,P<0.01)。결론7.0 T MRI ADC도화FA도재평고종류침윤범위구유경명현적개치,병변면적여병리결과유흔고적상관성,가위유선암술전병변범위평고제공중요적삼고신식。
Objectives:To evaluate the accuracy of inifltration range of breast cancer tissue in vitro using 7.0 T magnetic resonance imaging(MRI), and to verify the possible value of determining the breast tumor margin before surgery by MRI. Materials and Methods:Fresh breast cancer tissue in vitro (n=17) were underwent 7.0 T MRI and histological examination. After acquisition of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI)、apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) imaging on the 7.0 T MRI machines, the edge of lesion was drawn out manually and the area of tumor was calculated by VnmrJ 4.0. The HE dyeing slice of pathology was observed under a microscope. The edge of lesion was drawn out manually and the area was calculated by Photoshop software. The correlation between the area of tumor from MRI and the histological slice was analyzed using Pearson correlation test of SPSS version 19.0. Results:In all specimens, there were 14 cases of breast inifltrative ductal carcinoma, 2 cases breast papillary carcinoma and 1 case of mucinous breast carcinoma conifrmed pathologically. Signiifcant correlation was found between the area of breast tumor on DWI, ADC, FA mapping and histological result (4.32±1.28) cm2 in DWI vs. (3.81±1.12)cm2 in histological slice, Pearson correlation coefifcient r=0.966, P=0.00, (4.68±1.43) cm2 in ADC vs. (3.81± histological slice, Pearson correlation coefifcient r=0.976, P=0.00, (4.74±1.53) cm2 in FA vs. (3.81±1.12) cm2 in histological slice, Pearson correlation coefifcient r=0.964, P=0.00). Conclusions:Although all of the areas acquired by MRI were larger than those by histological results, there was signiifcant correlation between them. Thus, useful information for evaluating the inifltration range of breast tumor may be provided by MRI. 1.12) cm2 in histological slice, Pearson correlation coefficient r=0.976, P=0.00, (4.74±1.53) cm2 in FA vs. (3.81±1.12) cm2 in histological slice, Pearson correlation coefficient r=0.964, P=0.00). Conclusions: Although all of the areas acquired by MRI were larger than those by histological results, there was significant correlation between them. Thus, useful information for evaluating the infiltration range of breast tumor may be provided by MRI.