风景园林
風景園林
풍경완림
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
2015年
1期
52-69
,共18页
罗毅%李明翰%段诗乐(译)%张雪葳(译)%刘京一(校)%吴丹子(校)
囉毅%李明翰%段詩樂(譯)%張雪葳(譯)%劉京一(校)%吳丹子(校)
라의%리명한%단시악(역)%장설위(역)%류경일(교)%오단자(교)
可持续性%绩效评估%绿色能源与环境设计先锋认证%可持续场所倡议
可持續性%績效評估%綠色能源與環境設計先鋒認證%可持續場所倡議
가지속성%적효평고%록색능원여배경설계선봉인증%가지속장소창의
Sustainability%Performance Evaluation%LEED-ND%SITES
风景园林学是一门循证的(evidence-based)专业和学科,因而需要充足的依据来指导未来的设计。为了推进可持续的设计实践,收集科学证据来支撑设计并体现绩效至关重要。美国风景园林基金会的景观绩效系列(Landscape Performance Series,简称LPS)是收集这类证据的一种尝试。LPS建立在可持续三角(sustainability triad)架构上,通过研究者与从业者的合作,对在环境、经济、社会层面上景观方法运用的成果进行量化。景观绩效的研究尚不成熟,在评价指标和方法上还存在着许多空白。本研究有两项主要任务:一是将现行的景观绩效指标与其他度量系统进行对比,找出差别,为完善将来的景观绩效的指标提出建议;二是检验和探讨景观绩效量化通用方法的可靠性和有效性。
風景園林學是一門循證的(evidence-based)專業和學科,因而需要充足的依據來指導未來的設計。為瞭推進可持續的設計實踐,收集科學證據來支撐設計併體現績效至關重要。美國風景園林基金會的景觀績效繫列(Landscape Performance Series,簡稱LPS)是收集這類證據的一種嘗試。LPS建立在可持續三角(sustainability triad)架構上,通過研究者與從業者的閤作,對在環境、經濟、社會層麵上景觀方法運用的成果進行量化。景觀績效的研究尚不成熟,在評價指標和方法上還存在著許多空白。本研究有兩項主要任務:一是將現行的景觀績效指標與其他度量繫統進行對比,找齣差彆,為完善將來的景觀績效的指標提齣建議;二是檢驗和探討景觀績效量化通用方法的可靠性和有效性。
풍경완림학시일문순증적(evidence-based)전업화학과,인이수요충족적의거래지도미래적설계。위료추진가지속적설계실천,수집과학증거래지탱설계병체현적효지관중요。미국풍경완림기금회적경관적효계렬(Landscape Performance Series,간칭LPS)시수집저류증거적일충상시。LPS건립재가지속삼각(sustainability triad)가구상,통과연구자여종업자적합작,대재배경、경제、사회층면상경관방법운용적성과진행양화。경관적효적연구상불성숙,재평개지표화방법상환존재착허다공백。본연구유량항주요임무:일시장현행적경관적효지표여기타도량계통진행대비,조출차별,위완선장래적경관적효적지표제출건의;이시검험화탐토경관적효양화통용방법적가고성화유효성。
Landscape architecture is an evidence-based profession and discipline, in which creditable evidence is used to guide future design. In order to promote sustainable design practice, scientific evidence that supports design and presents performance needs to be colected. Landscape Architecture Foundation’s Landscape Performance Series (LPS) is one of the efforts that attempt to colect this evidence. Built upon the sustainability triad, LPS is intended to quantify outcomes of applied landscape solutions in environmental, economic and social aspects through a colaboration of researchers and practitioners. Landscape performance research is stil in its infancy. There exist a number of gaps in its metrics and methods. This study includes two major tasks. The first is to compare the currently used metrics of landscape performance with other measuring systems in order to identify gaps and make recommendations on improving future landscape performance metrics. The second is to examine and discuss the reliability and validity of the methods that are frequently used in landscape performance quantification.