证据科学
證據科學
증거과학
EVIDENCE SEIENCE
2014年
6期
760-768
,共9页
医疗事故技术鉴定%医学会%医疗损害责任技术鉴定%法医类司法鉴定%超范围鉴定
醫療事故技術鑒定%醫學會%醫療損害責任技術鑒定%法醫類司法鑒定%超範圍鑒定
의료사고기술감정%의학회%의료손해책임기술감정%법의류사법감정%초범위감정
Technical appraisal of eedical accidents%Medical association%Medical injuries responsibility technical identiifcation%Forensic judicial authentication%Identiifcation out of scope
医疗事故技术鉴定被运用于诉讼活动就是司法鉴定，它与法医类司法鉴定，是不同类别的鉴定，适用范围不同。作为《侵权责任法》专列的一类特殊侵权类型，其技术鉴定的名称，以“医疗损害责任技术鉴定”为妥。目前委托医学会进行医疗损害责任技术鉴定具有充分的法律依据。医疗纠纷争议中最为关键的“诊疗行为的过错”及“过错与损害后果之间的因果关系”这两个问题，正是法医病理鉴定、法医临床鉴定所无权涉及的内容。
醫療事故技術鑒定被運用于訴訟活動就是司法鑒定，它與法醫類司法鑒定，是不同類彆的鑒定，適用範圍不同。作為《侵權責任法》專列的一類特殊侵權類型，其技術鑒定的名稱，以“醫療損害責任技術鑒定”為妥。目前委託醫學會進行醫療損害責任技術鑒定具有充分的法律依據。醫療糾紛爭議中最為關鍵的“診療行為的過錯”及“過錯與損害後果之間的因果關繫”這兩箇問題，正是法醫病理鑒定、法醫臨床鑒定所無權涉及的內容。
의료사고기술감정피운용우소송활동취시사법감정，타여법의류사법감정，시불동유별적감정，괄용범위불동。작위《침권책임법》전렬적일류특수침권류형，기기술감정적명칭，이“의료손해책임기술감정”위타。목전위탁의학회진행의료손해책임기술감정구유충분적법률의거。의료규분쟁의중최위관건적“진료행위적과착”급“과착여손해후과지간적인과관계”저량개문제，정시법의병리감정、법의림상감정소무권섭급적내용。
Judicial identiifcation can be seen as technical appraisal of medical accidents used in the legal issues, which is different from forensic judicial authentication in the range of application. As a special type of Tort Liability Law, it is sensible to denominate it as “Medical Injuries Responsibility Technical Identiifcation”. The practice accords with legal substratum to authorize Medical Association to be responsible for medical injuries responsibility technical identification. The two critical questions in medical dispute controversy are “the fault of diagnosis and treatment behavior” and “the Cause-and-effect relationship between the fault and the result of injury outcome”, which is quite another thing for Forensic Pathology Identiifcation Forensic Clinical Identiifcation that have no rights to involve in.
