CAJ | 학술논문

以口供在我国传统刑事诉讼到目前刑事诉讼法中证据地位的转变为基点分析，起源于西方的律师在场权制度所保护的法益：防止在侦查过程中过度的依赖口供，遏制刑讯逼供和保障犯罪嫌疑人的沉默权，在我国已经基本实现。不仅如此，我国现阶段还尚不具备设置律师在场权的基本法制环境，若急于设置将冲击口供普通证据地位。故主张目前我国不需要赋予律师在场权。
이구공재아국전통형사소송도목전형사소송법중증거지위적전변위기점분석，기원우서방적률사재장권제도소보호적법익：방지재정사과정중과도적의뢰구공，알제형신핍공화보장범죄혐의인적침묵권，재아국이경기본실현。불부여차，아국현계단환상불구비설치률사재장권적기본법제배경，약급우설치장충격구공보통증거지위。고주장목전아국불수요부여률사재장권。
Based on analyzing the change of oral confession status from traditional criminal procedure to the current in our country, the legal interests—to prevent excessive reliance on confessions during the investigation process, to deter and protect the suspect’s right of silence that originations in the west of the lawyer’s presence right system protect have been largely achieved. Not only that, but also there is no atmosphere to set the right of lawyer’s presence right at this stage in China. Setting it eagerly will lead to an abnormal state. Thus we claim that it is no immediate need to endow the lawyers with the presence right.