现代诊断与治疗
現代診斷與治療
현대진단여치료
MODERN DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT
2014年
18期
4088-4089
,共2页
经阴道超声检查%子宫内膜病变%临床价值
經陰道超聲檢查%子宮內膜病變%臨床價值
경음도초성검사%자궁내막병변%림상개치
Transvaginal ultrasound%Endometrial lesion%Clinical value
目的:探讨经阴道超声诊断子宫内膜病变的临床价值。方法选取我院2013年4月~2014年4月收治的经病理证实的70例子宫内膜病变患者作为研究对象,回顾性分析该组患者同时行经腹超声检查和经阴道超声检查资料,将两种检查结果分别与诊断性刮宫的病理结果相对照,计算两种方法的诊断符合率,并对比分析。结果以病理诊断结果为金标准,经腹超声检查诊断符合48例,诊断符合率68.57%(48/70);经阴道超声检查诊断符合62例,诊断符合率88.57%(62/70)。两种方法对比分析,经阴道超声检查诊断符合率显著高于经腹超声检查诊断符合率,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论经阴道超声检查能更快速、直观地判断子宫内膜病变,具有较高的诊断符合率,是发现子宫内膜病变的一种简便、无创的重要诊断方法。
目的:探討經陰道超聲診斷子宮內膜病變的臨床價值。方法選取我院2013年4月~2014年4月收治的經病理證實的70例子宮內膜病變患者作為研究對象,迴顧性分析該組患者同時行經腹超聲檢查和經陰道超聲檢查資料,將兩種檢查結果分彆與診斷性颳宮的病理結果相對照,計算兩種方法的診斷符閤率,併對比分析。結果以病理診斷結果為金標準,經腹超聲檢查診斷符閤48例,診斷符閤率68.57%(48/70);經陰道超聲檢查診斷符閤62例,診斷符閤率88.57%(62/70)。兩種方法對比分析,經陰道超聲檢查診斷符閤率顯著高于經腹超聲檢查診斷符閤率,差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論經陰道超聲檢查能更快速、直觀地判斷子宮內膜病變,具有較高的診斷符閤率,是髮現子宮內膜病變的一種簡便、無創的重要診斷方法。
목적:탐토경음도초성진단자궁내막병변적림상개치。방법선취아원2013년4월~2014년4월수치적경병리증실적70례자궁내막병변환자작위연구대상,회고성분석해조환자동시행경복초성검사화경음도초성검사자료,장량충검사결과분별여진단성괄궁적병리결과상대조,계산량충방법적진단부합솔,병대비분석。결과이병리진단결과위금표준,경복초성검사진단부합48례,진단부합솔68.57%(48/70);경음도초성검사진단부합62례,진단부합솔88.57%(62/70)。량충방법대비분석,경음도초성검사진단부합솔현저고우경복초성검사진단부합솔,차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론경음도초성검사능경쾌속、직관지판단자궁내막병변,구유교고적진단부합솔,시발현자궁내막병변적일충간편、무창적중요진단방법。
Objective To explore the clinical value of transvaginal ultrasound in the diagnosis of en-dometrial lesions. Methods In our hospital from April 2013 to April 2014, 70 patients with endometri-al lesions confirmed by pathologically were as research objects. The data of patients underwent trans abdominal ultrasound and transvaginal ultrasound was retrospectively analyzed. Two kinds of examina-tion results of pathology and diagnostic curettage results were contrasted. Diagnostic accordance rate of two kinds of methods were calculated and comparative analyzed. Results The results were compared with pathological diagnosis, transabdominal ultrasonography were diagnosed in 48 cases,and the diag-nostic accordance rate was 68.57%(48/70); 62 cases were in accordance with transvaginal ultrasound. The diagnostic accordance rate was 88.57%(62/70). Compared with the two methods, transvaginal ultra-sound diagnosis coincidence rate was significantly higher than that in the diagnosis of abdominal ultra-sonography accordance rate;The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Transvagi-nal ultrasound examination can be a method with more rapid, intuitive judgment of endometrial lesions, high rate of diagnostic accordance. It is a simple, noninvasive diagnosis methods of endometrial lesions.