西部林业科学
西部林業科學
서부임업과학
JOURNAL OF WEST CHINA FORESTRY SCIENCE
2015年
1期
1-8
,共8页
喻庆国%卢双珍%曹顺伟%董跃宇%李昊民%刘朝蓬%石明%袁磊
喻慶國%盧雙珍%曹順偉%董躍宇%李昊民%劉朝蓬%石明%袁磊
유경국%로쌍진%조순위%동약우%리호민%류조봉%석명%원뢰
高原湖泊%时空演变%驱动因子%矢量数据
高原湖泊%時空縯變%驅動因子%矢量數據
고원호박%시공연변%구동인자%시량수거
plateau lake%temporal-spatial evolution%driving factors%vector data
基于纳帕海、属都湖、碧塔海和剑湖4个高原湖泊矢量数据,利用ArcMap 10、 Fragstats 3.3、 Excel等软件,系统分析了1955~2012年4个高原湖泊水域面积和形状的时空演变规律及其驱动因子。结果表明,(1)湖泊时空演变规律各异。纳帕海水域面积和形状复杂程度都处于无规律的波动变化过程中。属都湖水域面积和形状复杂程度1955~1994年都处于增加状态,1994~2011年保持不变。碧塔海水域面积和形状复杂程度没有发生变化。剑湖水域面积1957~2012年呈减少趋势,形状复杂程度呈增加趋势。(2)时空变化程度各不相同。4个高原湖泊时空变化程度从大到小的排序为纳帕海﹥剑湖﹥属都湖﹥碧塔海。(3)演变驱动因子不尽一致。纳帕海的驱动因子主要为疏浚落水洞、建闸控水、泥沙淤积、改造河道、气候变化、湖水污染和旅游干扰。剑湖的驱动因子主要为疏浚河道、泥沙淤积、湖滩开发、建闸控水、气候变化和湖水污染。属都湖的驱动因子主要为筑坝蓄水。人为干扰和气候变化没有导致碧塔海湖泊的变化。(4)受人为干扰程度有差异。4个高原湖泊受人为干扰程度由重到轻的排序为纳帕海﹥剑湖﹥属都湖﹥碧塔海。
基于納帕海、屬都湖、碧塔海和劍湖4箇高原湖泊矢量數據,利用ArcMap 10、 Fragstats 3.3、 Excel等軟件,繫統分析瞭1955~2012年4箇高原湖泊水域麵積和形狀的時空縯變規律及其驅動因子。結果錶明,(1)湖泊時空縯變規律各異。納帕海水域麵積和形狀複雜程度都處于無規律的波動變化過程中。屬都湖水域麵積和形狀複雜程度1955~1994年都處于增加狀態,1994~2011年保持不變。碧塔海水域麵積和形狀複雜程度沒有髮生變化。劍湖水域麵積1957~2012年呈減少趨勢,形狀複雜程度呈增加趨勢。(2)時空變化程度各不相同。4箇高原湖泊時空變化程度從大到小的排序為納帕海﹥劍湖﹥屬都湖﹥碧塔海。(3)縯變驅動因子不儘一緻。納帕海的驅動因子主要為疏浚落水洞、建閘控水、泥沙淤積、改造河道、氣候變化、湖水汙染和旅遊榦擾。劍湖的驅動因子主要為疏浚河道、泥沙淤積、湖灘開髮、建閘控水、氣候變化和湖水汙染。屬都湖的驅動因子主要為築壩蓄水。人為榦擾和氣候變化沒有導緻碧塔海湖泊的變化。(4)受人為榦擾程度有差異。4箇高原湖泊受人為榦擾程度由重到輕的排序為納帕海﹥劍湖﹥屬都湖﹥碧塔海。
기우납파해、속도호、벽탑해화검호4개고원호박시량수거,이용ArcMap 10、 Fragstats 3.3、 Excel등연건,계통분석료1955~2012년4개고원호박수역면적화형상적시공연변규률급기구동인자。결과표명,(1)호박시공연변규률각이。납파해수역면적화형상복잡정도도처우무규률적파동변화과정중。속도호수역면적화형상복잡정도1955~1994년도처우증가상태,1994~2011년보지불변。벽탑해수역면적화형상복잡정도몰유발생변화。검호수역면적1957~2012년정감소추세,형상복잡정도정증가추세。(2)시공변화정도각불상동。4개고원호박시공변화정도종대도소적배서위납파해﹥검호﹥속도호﹥벽탑해。(3)연변구동인자불진일치。납파해적구동인자주요위소준낙수동、건갑공수、니사어적、개조하도、기후변화、호수오염화여유간우。검호적구동인자주요위소준하도、니사어적、호탄개발、건갑공수、기후변화화호수오염。속도호적구동인자주요위축패축수。인위간우화기후변화몰유도치벽탑해호박적변화。(4)수인위간우정도유차이。4개고원호박수인위간우정도유중도경적배서위납파해﹥검호﹥속도호﹥벽탑해。
Based on vector dada of Yunnan’s Napahai, Shuduhu, Bitahai and Jianhu lakes from 1955 to 2012, by using ArcMap 10, Fragstats 3.3 and Excel etc., spatial-temporal dynamics and driving factors of the four plat-eau lakes’area and shape from 1955 to 2012 were summarized.The results showed that: (1) The spatial-tempo-ral dynamic patterns were different.Both water surface area and shape-complexity of Napahai lake’ s waterscape were in a chaotic fluctuation.The water surface area and shape-complexity of Shuduhu lake were increasing during the time period of 1955~1994, and unchanged during the time period of 1994~2011.The Bitahai lake’s water surface area and shape-complexity were almost unchanged.The water area of Jianhu lake was decreasing during the time period of 1957~2012.But meanwhile, its waterscape’ s shape-complexity were increasing.(2) The degree of spatial-temporal dynamics was different.In term of different spatial-temporal dynamics degree, the four lakes could be sorted from big to small as the following:Napahai, Jianhu, Shuduhu and Bitahai.(3) The driving fac-tors were different.The driving factors of Napahai lake were dredging of ponors, sluice control of water, sediment deposition, river renovation, climate change, water pollution and tourism disturbance. The driving factors of Jianhu lake were dredging the waterway, sediment deposition, lakeshore exploitation, sluice control of water, cli-mate change and water pollution.The main driving factor of Shuduhu lake was dam construction to store water. Human disturbances and climate change had no impact on Bitahai lake.(4) The degree of human disturbance was different.In term of human disturbance degree, the four lakes could be sorted from big to small as the following:Napahai, Jianhu, Shuduhu and Bitahai.