临床医药文献电子杂志
臨床醫藥文獻電子雜誌
림상의약문헌전자잡지
Journal of Clinical Medical Literature (ElectronicEdition)
2014年
14期
2690-2690,2692
,共2页
妇科宫颈糜烂%光电治疗仪%临床效果%对比分析
婦科宮頸糜爛%光電治療儀%臨床效果%對比分析
부과궁경미란%광전치료의%림상효과%대비분석
Gynecological cervical erosion%Photoelectric treatment instrument%Clinical effect%Comparative analysis
目的：统计并分析2种不同物理治疗仪治疗妇科宫颈糜烂的效果。方法在我院选取90例宫颈糜烂患者，根据患者选取物理治疗仪的不同将其分为治疗组、对照组两组，其中治疗组患者和对照组患者分别采用光电治疗仪和硝酸银进行治疗。结果经各自治疗后，治疗组患者总有效率（91.11%）相对于对照组（57.78%）来说，前者占优势；在光电治疗仪对I、II、III度宫颈糜烂治疗中，前者有效率均比后两者明显要高；而对乳头型宫颈糜烂、颗粒型及单纯性宫颈糜烂的治疗中，前者有效率仅为85.83%，均较后两者明显要低。结论在妇科宫颈糜烂的临床中采用光电治疗仪进行治疗，是一种简单有效的物理治疗方法，而且安全可靠。
目的：統計併分析2種不同物理治療儀治療婦科宮頸糜爛的效果。方法在我院選取90例宮頸糜爛患者，根據患者選取物理治療儀的不同將其分為治療組、對照組兩組，其中治療組患者和對照組患者分彆採用光電治療儀和硝痠銀進行治療。結果經各自治療後，治療組患者總有效率（91.11%）相對于對照組（57.78%）來說，前者佔優勢；在光電治療儀對I、II、III度宮頸糜爛治療中，前者有效率均比後兩者明顯要高；而對乳頭型宮頸糜爛、顆粒型及單純性宮頸糜爛的治療中，前者有效率僅為85.83%，均較後兩者明顯要低。結論在婦科宮頸糜爛的臨床中採用光電治療儀進行治療，是一種簡單有效的物理治療方法，而且安全可靠。
목적：통계병분석2충불동물리치료의치료부과궁경미란적효과。방법재아원선취90례궁경미란환자，근거환자선취물리치료의적불동장기분위치료조、대조조량조，기중치료조환자화대조조환자분별채용광전치료의화초산은진행치료。결과경각자치료후，치료조환자총유효솔（91.11%）상대우대조조（57.78%）래설，전자점우세；재광전치료의대I、II、III도궁경미란치료중，전자유효솔균비후량자명현요고；이대유두형궁경미란、과립형급단순성궁경미란적치료중，전자유효솔부위85.83%，균교후량자명현요저。결론재부과궁경미란적림상중채용광전치료의진행치료，시일충간단유효적물리치료방법，이차안전가고。
ObjectiveStatistics and analysis of two kinds of effects of different physical therapy device for treating gynecological cervical erosion patients.Methods90 cases in our hospital selected patients with cervical erosion, according to the patient select a different physical therapy device will be divided into the treatment group and the control group, treatment group and a control group of patients in which patients were using optical instrument and silver nitrate therapy for treatment . ResultsAfter each treatment, patients treated with total efifciency (91.11%) compared to the control group (57.78%), the former dominant; photoelectric treatment instrument of I, II, III degree treatment of cervical erosion, the former after both significantly higher than the efficiency; while treatment for papillary cervical erosion, particle type and simple cervical erosion, the former has an efifciency of only 85.83%, both signiifcantly lower than after. ConclusionIn clinical gynecological treatment of cervical erosion photoelectric instrument for treatment, is a simple and effective method of physical therapy, and safe and reliable.
