中华耳科学杂志
中華耳科學雜誌
중화이과학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF OTOLOGY
2014年
4期
617-621
,共5页
符秋养%梁勇%彭贤%王涛
符鞦養%樑勇%彭賢%王濤
부추양%량용%팽현%왕도
言语%听性脑干反应%刺激强度%刺激率%析因分析
言語%聽性腦榦反應%刺激彊度%刺激率%析因分析
언어%은성뇌간반응%자격강도%자격솔%석인분석
Speech%Auditory brainstem response%Sstimulus intensity%Stimulus rate%Factorial analysis
目的:探讨言语诱发听性脑干反应(speech evoked auditory brainstem response,s-ABR)的影响因素,揭示s-ABR更多的电生理特性。方法将24名健康成人(24耳)的s-ABR采用两种刺激率(11.1次/s、20.0次/s)和两种刺激强度(80dB SPL、60dB SPL)进行2×2×6析因实验,分析s-ABR波形评分值、各主波潜伏期及幅值。结果s-ABR波形评分值差异无统计意义(p>0.05);各主波潜伏期的刺激率差异无统计学意义;各幅值(除外Ⅴ波)的刺激率差异亦无统计学意义;大部分主波潜伏期(除外A波、F波及O波)的强度差异有统计学意义(p<0.05),大部分主波幅值(除外Ⅴ波和O波)的强度差异则无统计学意义;波形量化评分、各主波潜伏期和幅值均无刺激率和刺激强度的交互效应(p>0.05)。结论s-ABR测试的刺激率和刺激强度在一定范围内没有相互影响,测试中可根据需要选择刺激率和刺激强度。
目的:探討言語誘髮聽性腦榦反應(speech evoked auditory brainstem response,s-ABR)的影響因素,揭示s-ABR更多的電生理特性。方法將24名健康成人(24耳)的s-ABR採用兩種刺激率(11.1次/s、20.0次/s)和兩種刺激彊度(80dB SPL、60dB SPL)進行2×2×6析因實驗,分析s-ABR波形評分值、各主波潛伏期及幅值。結果s-ABR波形評分值差異無統計意義(p>0.05);各主波潛伏期的刺激率差異無統計學意義;各幅值(除外Ⅴ波)的刺激率差異亦無統計學意義;大部分主波潛伏期(除外A波、F波及O波)的彊度差異有統計學意義(p<0.05),大部分主波幅值(除外Ⅴ波和O波)的彊度差異則無統計學意義;波形量化評分、各主波潛伏期和幅值均無刺激率和刺激彊度的交互效應(p>0.05)。結論s-ABR測試的刺激率和刺激彊度在一定範圍內沒有相互影響,測試中可根據需要選擇刺激率和刺激彊度。
목적:탐토언어유발은성뇌간반응(speech evoked auditory brainstem response,s-ABR)적영향인소,게시s-ABR경다적전생리특성。방법장24명건강성인(24이)적s-ABR채용량충자격솔(11.1차/s、20.0차/s)화량충자격강도(80dB SPL、60dB SPL)진행2×2×6석인실험,분석s-ABR파형평분치、각주파잠복기급폭치。결과s-ABR파형평분치차이무통계의의(p>0.05);각주파잠복기적자격솔차이무통계학의의;각폭치(제외Ⅴ파)적자격솔차이역무통계학의의;대부분주파잠복기(제외A파、F파급O파)적강도차이유통계학의의(p<0.05),대부분주파폭치(제외Ⅴ파화O파)적강도차이칙무통계학의의;파형양화평분、각주파잠복기화폭치균무자격솔화자격강도적교호효응(p>0.05)。결론s-ABR측시적자격솔화자격강도재일정범위내몰유상호영향,측시중가근거수요선택자격솔화자격강도。
Objective To study variables affecting speech evoked auditory brainstem response (s-ABR) and report its electrophysiological characteristics. Methods Effects of stimulus rates (11.1/s and 20.0/s) and stimulus intensities (80 dB SPL and 60 dB SPL) on s-ABRs were studied in 24 healthy adults (24 ears), using a 2 × 2 × 6 factorial experimental design. s-ABR waveform scores, latencies and amplitudes of the feature peaks were analyzed. Results Stimulus rate had no effects on waveform scores of all s-ABRs and latencies of feature peaks (p>0.05), or amplitudes (except for peak V). Stimulus inten?sity seemed to affect latencies of feature peaks (except for peak A, F and O) (p<0.05), but not amplitudes of feature peaks (ex?cept for peak V and O). Different stimulus rate and intensity combinations had little effects on s-ABR waveform scores, laten?cies or amplitudes of feature peaks. Conclusion The characteristics of s-ABR are maintained across a range of stimulus rates and intensities, and not affected by different combinations of stimulus rate and intensity. A relatively wide range of stimulus intensities and rates can be selected based on needs in s-ABR testing.