CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨CA125、CEA、AFP联合检测在卵巢癌临床诊断中的价值。方法选取来我院就诊的42例卵巢癌患者为观察组，并选取同期就诊的卵巢良性肿瘤患者40例为对照组，采用电化学发光法检测两组患者血清中CA125、CEA及AFP水平，并对两组患者CA125、CEA及AFP水平和阳性率进行比较。结果观察组中血清CA125、CEA及AFP水平均高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05），阳性率优于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05），且CA125、CEA及AFP联合检测的阳性率高于单项检测结果，差异有统计学意义（p<0.05）。结论 CA125、CEA、AFP联合检测有利于提高卵巢癌检出的阳性率，在其临床诊断中具有较高价值。
목적：탐토CA125、CEA、AFP연합검측재란소암림상진단중적개치。방법선취래아원취진적42례란소암환자위관찰조，병선취동기취진적란소량성종류환자40례위대조조，채용전화학발광법검측량조환자혈청중CA125、CEA급AFP수평，병대량조환자CA125、CEA급AFP수평화양성솔진행비교。결과관찰조중혈청CA125、CEA급AFP수평균고우대조조，차이유통계학의의（P<0.05），양성솔우우대조조，차이유통계학의의（P<0.05），차CA125、CEA급AFP연합검측적양성솔고우단항검측결과，차이유통계학의의（p<0.05）。결론 CA125、CEA、AFP연합검측유리우제고란소암검출적양성솔，재기림상진단중구유교고개치。
objective: to study the clinical diagnosis value of CA125, CEA and AFP joint examination in the ovarian cancer. methods: selecting 42 cases of ovarian cancer patients for observation group, and selecting 40 cases of ovarian benign tumor patients for control group, the CA125, CEA and AFP level of two groups were compared. Results: the CA125, CEA and AFP level in observation group were higher than control group (P < 0.05), the positive rate was better than control group (P<0.05), and the positive rate of CA125, CEA and AFP united detection was higher than the single test results (P < 0.05). Conclusion:CA125, CEA and AFP joint detection can help improve the positive rate of ovarian cancer detection,had high value in clinical diagnosis.