海南医学
海南醫學
해남의학
HAINAN MEDICAL JOURNAL
2015年
2期
277-280
,共4页
右美托咪啶%咪达唑仑%老年患者%谵妄%系统评价
右美託咪啶%咪達唑崙%老年患者%譫妄%繫統評價
우미탁미정%미체서륜%노년환자%섬망%계통평개
Dexmedetomidine%Midazolam%Elderly patients%Delirium%Systematic review
目的:系统评价右美托咪定和咪达唑仑对老年患者术后谵妄的影响。方法计算机检索PubMed、SCI、EMbase、The Cochrane Library、CNKI、CBM、WanFang Data和VIP等数据库,全面收集右美托咪啶和咪达唑仑麻醉对老年患者术后谵妄影响的随机对照试验(RCT),检索时限均为建库至2013年12月。由两位研究者按照纳入与排除标准独立筛选文献、提取资料和评价质量后,采用RevMan 5.2软件进行Meta分析。结果纳入6个RCT,共170例老年患者。Meta分析结果显示:与咪达唑仑组比较,经右美托咪定诱导后,右美托咪定组的谵妄发生率低于咪达唑[RR=0.17,95%CI (0.09,0.30),P<0.00001]。结论咪达唑仑在老年患者术后发生谵妄率高于右美托咪啶。但鉴于纳入研究较少且样本量小,特别是质量不高,建议临床上开展大样本、多中心、高质量的随机对照试验进一步论证。
目的:繫統評價右美託咪定和咪達唑崙對老年患者術後譫妄的影響。方法計算機檢索PubMed、SCI、EMbase、The Cochrane Library、CNKI、CBM、WanFang Data和VIP等數據庫,全麵收集右美託咪啶和咪達唑崙痳醉對老年患者術後譫妄影響的隨機對照試驗(RCT),檢索時限均為建庫至2013年12月。由兩位研究者按照納入與排除標準獨立篩選文獻、提取資料和評價質量後,採用RevMan 5.2軟件進行Meta分析。結果納入6箇RCT,共170例老年患者。Meta分析結果顯示:與咪達唑崙組比較,經右美託咪定誘導後,右美託咪定組的譫妄髮生率低于咪達唑[RR=0.17,95%CI (0.09,0.30),P<0.00001]。結論咪達唑崙在老年患者術後髮生譫妄率高于右美託咪啶。但鑒于納入研究較少且樣本量小,特彆是質量不高,建議臨床上開展大樣本、多中心、高質量的隨機對照試驗進一步論證。
목적:계통평개우미탁미정화미체서륜대노년환자술후섬망적영향。방법계산궤검색PubMed、SCI、EMbase、The Cochrane Library、CNKI、CBM、WanFang Data화VIP등수거고,전면수집우미탁미정화미체서륜마취대노년환자술후섬망영향적수궤대조시험(RCT),검색시한균위건고지2013년12월。유량위연구자안조납입여배제표준독립사선문헌、제취자료화평개질량후,채용RevMan 5.2연건진행Meta분석。결과납입6개RCT,공170례노년환자。Meta분석결과현시:여미체서륜조비교,경우미탁미정유도후,우미탁미정조적섬망발생솔저우미체서[RR=0.17,95%CI (0.09,0.30),P<0.00001]。결론미체서륜재노년환자술후발생섬망솔고우우미탁미정。단감우납입연구교소차양본량소,특별시질량불고,건의림상상개전대양본、다중심、고질량적수궤대조시험진일보론증。
Objective To evaluate the effect of Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam on postoperitive delir-ium in elderly patients by Meta-analysis. Methods Trials were collected through searches of PubMed, SCI, EM-base, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM, VIP and Wanfang databases (From the date of establishment of the data-bases to December 2013) for randomized controlled trials (RCT) on the effect of Dexmedetomidine and Midazol-am on postoperitive delirium in elderly patients. The included studies were evaluated with criteria by two research-ers independently and the extracted data were analyzed by RevMan 5.2. Results Six RCT studies involving 170 old patients met the inclusion criteria. The results of meta-analysis showed that,compared with the Midazol-am-treated patients, the prevalence of delirium was lower in Dexmedetomidine-treated patients [RR=0.17, 95%CI (0.09, 0.30), P<0.000 01]. Conclusion The incidence of delirium in Dexmedetomidine-treated patients is lower than that in the Midazolam-treated patients. However, due to the few included RCTs and small samples, especially the lower quality of included RCTs, more large-samples, high-quality RCTs are required for further verify.