食品安全质量检测学报
食品安全質量檢測學報
식품안전질량검측학보
FOOD SAFETY AND QUALITY DETECTION TECHNOLOGY
2015年
1期
54-59
,共6页
庞艳华%孙瑶%高鹭%王楠%彭心婷%宋海佳%曹际娟
龐豔華%孫瑤%高鷺%王楠%彭心婷%宋海佳%曹際娟
방염화%손요%고로%왕남%팽심정%송해가%조제연
甲基汞%海产品%超声辅助萃取%直接测汞法
甲基汞%海產品%超聲輔助萃取%直接測汞法
갑기홍%해산품%초성보조췌취%직접측홍법
methylmercury%seafood%ultrasonic-assisted extraction%direct Hg analyzer
目的:建立超声辅助溶剂萃取——直接测汞法测定海产品中甲基汞的检测方法,应用此方法检测黄鱼、鳕鱼、金枪鱼、扇贝、杂色蛤等海产品中甲基汞的含量。方法选择盐酸为萃取溶剂,通过优化萃取溶剂的浓度和提取条件,选择5 mol/L 盐酸作为溶剂,超声1 h,以二氯甲烷分两次萃取,再以水反萃取,应用测汞仪直接测定水相中甲基汞的含量。结果甲基汞标准曲线的线性相关系数大于0.997,检出限为0.75 ng/g。不同类型生物标准参考物质实际测定值与标准参考值相符,测定值的相对标准偏差小于4%。结论该方法操作简便、快速、准确,适用于鱼、贝类海产品中甲基汞的快速萃取分离和测定。不同种类样品中甲基汞污染程度不同,实验选取的样品中甲基汞的含量均未超过卫生限量,鳕鱼、金枪鱼中甲基汞含量较高。
目的:建立超聲輔助溶劑萃取——直接測汞法測定海產品中甲基汞的檢測方法,應用此方法檢測黃魚、鱈魚、金鎗魚、扇貝、雜色蛤等海產品中甲基汞的含量。方法選擇鹽痠為萃取溶劑,通過優化萃取溶劑的濃度和提取條件,選擇5 mol/L 鹽痠作為溶劑,超聲1 h,以二氯甲烷分兩次萃取,再以水反萃取,應用測汞儀直接測定水相中甲基汞的含量。結果甲基汞標準麯線的線性相關繫數大于0.997,檢齣限為0.75 ng/g。不同類型生物標準參攷物質實際測定值與標準參攷值相符,測定值的相對標準偏差小于4%。結論該方法操作簡便、快速、準確,適用于魚、貝類海產品中甲基汞的快速萃取分離和測定。不同種類樣品中甲基汞汙染程度不同,實驗選取的樣品中甲基汞的含量均未超過衛生限量,鱈魚、金鎗魚中甲基汞含量較高。
목적:건립초성보조용제췌취——직접측홍법측정해산품중갑기홍적검측방법,응용차방법검측황어、설어、금창어、선패、잡색합등해산품중갑기홍적함량。방법선택염산위췌취용제,통과우화췌취용제적농도화제취조건,선택5 mol/L 염산작위용제,초성1 h,이이록갑완분량차췌취,재이수반췌취,응용측홍의직접측정수상중갑기홍적함량。결과갑기홍표준곡선적선성상관계수대우0.997,검출한위0.75 ng/g。불동류형생물표준삼고물질실제측정치여표준삼고치상부,측정치적상대표준편차소우4%。결론해방법조작간편、쾌속、준학,괄용우어、패류해산품중갑기홍적쾌속췌취분리화측정。불동충류양품중갑기홍오염정도불동,실험선취적양품중갑기홍적함량균미초과위생한량,설어、금창어중갑기홍함량교고。
Objective To establish a method for determination of methylmercury (MeHg) in seafood using a direct Hg analyzer (DMA-80), and apply this method to detect the content of MeHg in Yellow croaker, cod, tuna, scallops, and clams. Methods MeHg was separated from bio sample matrix with 5 mol/L hydrochloric acid by ultrasound assisted for 1 h. The extraction conditions were optimized. After back-extraction of MeHg from organic methylene chloride solvent to aqueous solution, MeHg was determined by the mercury analyzer. Results The standard curve of linear correlation coefficient was greater than 0.997, and the detection limit of MeHg was 0.75 ng/g. The experimental results of standard reference materials were in a good agreement with the certified values, and the relative standard deviation of the determined values were less than 4%. Conclusion The method takes the advantage of simplicity and accuracy, and can be applied for the analysis of MeHg in different seafoods. There is obvious difference of MeHg content levels in seafood samples. The MeHg content in experimental samples do not exceed the health limits, and MeHg content is higher in cod and tuna.