中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2015年
4期
445-446,447
,共3页
麻醉后护理%全身麻醉%饮水%安全性%可行性
痳醉後護理%全身痳醉%飲水%安全性%可行性
마취후호리%전신마취%음수%안전성%가행성
Post anesthesia nursing%General anesthesia%Drinking water%Safety%Feasibility
目的：探讨成人全麻患者术后早期少量饮水的安全性和可行性。方法将200例麻醉后监测治疗室全麻患者按随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组各100例。观察组患者实施麻醉后监测治疗室常规护理的同时给予早期少量饮水；对照组患者实施麻醉后监测治疗室常规护理。分别评价两组患者口干程度变化、复苏满意度、呕吐误吸发生率和再次饮水人数。结果观察组患者口干评分为(7.51±1.48)分,明显高于对照组口干评分(1.39±1.20)分,差异有统计学意义(t=32.12,P<0.05)；观察组发生误吸4例,对照组6例,两组比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.42,P>0.05)；观察组复苏满意度评分为(92.35±2.64)分,明显高于对照组的(67.94±7.46)分,差异有统计学意义( t=30.85,P<0.05)；观察组有再次饮水意愿者96例,对照组为91例,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=2.06,P>0.05)。结论全麻患者术后早期饮水具有安全性和可行性。
目的：探討成人全痳患者術後早期少量飲水的安全性和可行性。方法將200例痳醉後鑑測治療室全痳患者按隨機數字錶法分為觀察組和對照組各100例。觀察組患者實施痳醉後鑑測治療室常規護理的同時給予早期少量飲水；對照組患者實施痳醉後鑑測治療室常規護理。分彆評價兩組患者口榦程度變化、複囌滿意度、嘔吐誤吸髮生率和再次飲水人數。結果觀察組患者口榦評分為(7.51±1.48)分,明顯高于對照組口榦評分(1.39±1.20)分,差異有統計學意義(t=32.12,P<0.05)；觀察組髮生誤吸4例,對照組6例,兩組比較差異無統計學意義(χ2=0.42,P>0.05)；觀察組複囌滿意度評分為(92.35±2.64)分,明顯高于對照組的(67.94±7.46)分,差異有統計學意義( t=30.85,P<0.05)；觀察組有再次飲水意願者96例,對照組為91例,兩組比較,差異有統計學意義(χ2=2.06,P>0.05)。結論全痳患者術後早期飲水具有安全性和可行性。
목적：탐토성인전마환자술후조기소량음수적안전성화가행성。방법장200례마취후감측치료실전마환자안수궤수자표법분위관찰조화대조조각100례。관찰조환자실시마취후감측치료실상규호리적동시급여조기소량음수；대조조환자실시마취후감측치료실상규호리。분별평개량조환자구간정도변화、복소만의도、구토오흡발생솔화재차음수인수。결과관찰조환자구간평분위(7.51±1.48)분,명현고우대조조구간평분(1.39±1.20)분,차이유통계학의의(t=32.12,P<0.05)；관찰조발생오흡4례,대조조6례,량조비교차이무통계학의의(χ2=0.42,P>0.05)；관찰조복소만의도평분위(92.35±2.64)분,명현고우대조조적(67.94±7.46)분,차이유통계학의의( t=30.85,P<0.05)；관찰조유재차음수의원자96례,대조조위91례,량조비교,차이유통계학의의(χ2=2.06,P>0.05)。결론전마환자술후조기음수구유안전성화가행성。
Objective To explore the safety and feasibility of drinking Small amount water among adult patients with general anesthesia after operation. Methods A total of 200 adult patients with general anesthesia in post-anesthetic care unit ( PACU) were divided into observation group ( PACU routine nursing with giving a small amount of water care early) and control group ( PACU routine nursing care) each 100 cases according to random number table method. We compared the degree of dry mouth changes, recovery satisfaction, incidence of vomiting aspiration and rate of drinking water again. Results The score of dry mouth in the observation group (7. 51 ± 1. 48) significantly higher than that in the control group (1. 39 ± 1. 20) with statistical difference (t=32. 12,P<0. 05). Observation group, the incidence of aspiration was 4% while it was 6% in the control group (χ2 =0. 42,P>0. 05). Observation group for recovery satisfaction score (92. 35 ± 2. 64), significantly higher than the control group in recovery satisfaction score (67. 94 ± 7. 46). The difference was statistically significant (t=30. 85,P<0. 05). 96% of patients having intention to drink again in observation group compared with 91% of people having intention in the control group (χ2 =2. 06,P>0. 05). Conclusions Adult postoperative patients with general anesthesia drink early are safe and feasible.
