重庆医学
重慶醫學
중경의학
CHONGQING MEDICAL JOURNAL
2015年
3期
332-333,336
,共3页
子宫出血%子宫内膜活组织检查%一次性宫腔组织吸引管
子宮齣血%子宮內膜活組織檢查%一次性宮腔組織吸引管
자궁출혈%자궁내막활조직검사%일차성궁강조직흡인관
uterine bleeding%endometrial biopsy%one-time uterine cavity organizations sucker
目的:探讨一次性宫腔组织吸引管在异常子宫出血诊断中的临床价值。方法选取因异常子宫出血需进行子宫内膜活检的患者75例,在接受常规分段诊刮术前利用一次性宫腔组织吸引管先获取子宫内膜组织。比较两种方法的取材标本满意率和诊断符合率。结果一次性宫腔组织吸引管取材标本满意率为85.3%(64/75),常规分段诊刮术取材标本满意率为94.7%(71/75),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);一次性宫腔组织吸引管取材诊断符合率为90.3%(56/62),常规分段诊刮术取材诊断符合率为93.5%(58/62),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论一次性宫腔组织吸引管经济、有效、安全,可在一定程度上取代常规分段诊刮术作为评估异常子宫出血的初始检查。
目的:探討一次性宮腔組織吸引管在異常子宮齣血診斷中的臨床價值。方法選取因異常子宮齣血需進行子宮內膜活檢的患者75例,在接受常規分段診颳術前利用一次性宮腔組織吸引管先穫取子宮內膜組織。比較兩種方法的取材標本滿意率和診斷符閤率。結果一次性宮腔組織吸引管取材標本滿意率為85.3%(64/75),常規分段診颳術取材標本滿意率為94.7%(71/75),差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);一次性宮腔組織吸引管取材診斷符閤率為90.3%(56/62),常規分段診颳術取材診斷符閤率為93.5%(58/62),差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論一次性宮腔組織吸引管經濟、有效、安全,可在一定程度上取代常規分段診颳術作為評估異常子宮齣血的初始檢查。
목적:탐토일차성궁강조직흡인관재이상자궁출혈진단중적림상개치。방법선취인이상자궁출혈수진행자궁내막활검적환자75례,재접수상규분단진괄술전이용일차성궁강조직흡인관선획취자궁내막조직。비교량충방법적취재표본만의솔화진단부합솔。결과일차성궁강조직흡인관취재표본만의솔위85.3%(64/75),상규분단진괄술취재표본만의솔위94.7%(71/75),차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);일차성궁강조직흡인관취재진단부합솔위90.3%(56/62),상규분단진괄술취재진단부합솔위93.5%(58/62),차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론일차성궁강조직흡인관경제、유효、안전,가재일정정도상취대상규분단진괄술작위평고이상자궁출혈적초시검사。
Objective To explore the clinical value of the disposable uterine cavity tissue suction tube in diagnosing abnormal u‐terine bleeding .Methods Seventy‐five patients ,who needed an endometrial biopsy because of abnormal uterine bleeding ,were se‐lected for this study .An endometrial biopsy was performed by a disposable uterine cavity tissue suction tube before the conventional suction dilatation and curettage (D&C) .The sample satisfactory rate and the diagnose accordance rate of the two methods were compared .Results The sample satisfactory rate of the disposable uterine cavity tissue suction tube and of the D&C was 85 .3%(64/75) and 94 .7% (71/75) respectively .The difference was not statistically significant(P>0 .05) .The diagnose accordance rate of the disposable uterine cavity tissue suction tube and the D&C was 90 .3% (56/62) and 93 .5% (58/62) respectively .The differ‐ence was not statistically significant(P>0 .05) .Conclusion To a certain extent ,endometrial biopsy performed by disposable uter‐ine cavity tissue suction tube can be a substitute for D&C as the initial inspection to assess abnormal uterine bleeding ,for its econo‐my ,efficiency and safety .