开放教育研究
開放教育研究
개방교육연구
OPEN EDUCATION RESEARCH
2015年
1期
80-88
,共9页
绩效技术%组织要素模型%考夫曼%大系统规划
績效技術%組織要素模型%攷伕曼%大繫統規劃
적효기술%조직요소모형%고부만%대계통규화
human performance technology%organizational elements model%Roger Kaufman%mega planning
美国知名绩效技术专家罗杰·考夫曼( Roger Kaufman)强调绩效技术研究和实践中组织对社会的责任,并强调对目的和手段的区分。本研究即对考夫曼的理论和实践进行内容分析,以考夫曼的“组织要素模型”为核心,从“需求评估”、“战略规划”和“评价”三个维度对考夫曼的理论进行了系统分析和阐释,并在每个维度的分析中都运用了“成果-输出-产品-过程-输入”五要素的基本分析框架。考夫曼提出的“大系统规划”是一个主动适应的理念,其出发点首先是社会的需要。本研究在此基础上概括了考夫曼理论的三位一体结构,又从实践操作层面对其需求数据的使用模型和战略规划的过程模型进行阐释和分析,这两个模型在实践中贯彻了其主动规划的理念。最后,本研究从绩效技术整体视野审视了考夫曼理论的价值以及相应的启示。
美國知名績效技術專傢囉傑·攷伕曼( Roger Kaufman)彊調績效技術研究和實踐中組織對社會的責任,併彊調對目的和手段的區分。本研究即對攷伕曼的理論和實踐進行內容分析,以攷伕曼的“組織要素模型”為覈心,從“需求評估”、“戰略規劃”和“評價”三箇維度對攷伕曼的理論進行瞭繫統分析和闡釋,併在每箇維度的分析中都運用瞭“成果-輸齣-產品-過程-輸入”五要素的基本分析框架。攷伕曼提齣的“大繫統規劃”是一箇主動適應的理唸,其齣髮點首先是社會的需要。本研究在此基礎上概括瞭攷伕曼理論的三位一體結構,又從實踐操作層麵對其需求數據的使用模型和戰略規劃的過程模型進行闡釋和分析,這兩箇模型在實踐中貫徹瞭其主動規劃的理唸。最後,本研究從績效技術整體視野審視瞭攷伕曼理論的價值以及相應的啟示。
미국지명적효기술전가라걸·고부만( Roger Kaufman)강조적효기술연구화실천중조직대사회적책임,병강조대목적화수단적구분。본연구즉대고부만적이론화실천진행내용분석,이고부만적“조직요소모형”위핵심,종“수구평고”、“전략규화”화“평개”삼개유도대고부만적이론진행료계통분석화천석,병재매개유도적분석중도운용료“성과-수출-산품-과정-수입”오요소적기본분석광가。고부만제출적“대계통규화”시일개주동괄응적이념,기출발점수선시사회적수요。본연구재차기출상개괄료고부만이론적삼위일체결구,우종실천조작층면대기수구수거적사용모형화전략규화적과정모형진행천석화분석,저량개모형재실천중관철료기주동규화적이념。최후,본연구종적효기술정체시야심시료고부만이론적개치이급상응적계시。
This study made a content analysis on the literature of Roger Kaufman, and categorized on the theme and sub-theme. Dr. Kaufman is a past president for ISPI, and is a Thomas Gilbert Award winner. He has published 41 books and over 280 articles on strategic planning, performance improvement, quality management and continual im-provement, needs assessment, management, and evaluation. In his famous Organizational Elements Model ( OEM) , Dr. Kaufman identified five basic elements, i. e. inputs, processes, products, outputs, and outcomes. The OEM is the main theoretical framework for his theory and practice. <br> Dr. Kaufman insists that needs assessment is the formal process of identifying needs as gaps between current and desired results. His definition emphasizes that needs are gaps in results rather than gaps or deficiencies in processes or resources. He also made a distinction between needs assessment and quasi-needs assessment. This study made a com-parison for his evolving ideas about needs assessment. <br> Dr. Kaufman recommended the strategic planning model that could help us to contemplate societal outcomes in a proactive way. He identified three-level planning. From top-down viewpoint, the first level is mega planning, and focuses on results and their consequences for external clients and society. The second level is macro planning, and it focuses on the result that the organization can deliver out of itself. The third one is micro planning, and it narrows to the building block results that are produced within the organization. This three-level hierarchy consists of the Result Chain, and is closely linked with the concept of Ideal Visions. <br> Evaluation is also a significant construct in his research. By combining with the Kirkpatrick framework to the OEM, Dr. Kaufman offered a proactive thinking to moving evaluation from the end to an integral part of the whole performance improvement process. Kaufman's Evaluation framework concentrated on the organization's social responsi-bility and return on investment. <br> In this study, needs assessment, strategic planning, and evaluation in Kaufman's research were systematically analyzed and interpreted. And, in each part, the framework of"Outcome-Output-Product-Process-Input" was used as the main structure, and the trinity structure of Kaufman theory was identified based on this framework. <br> Finally, Kaufman's theory was examined and valued in the landscape of Human Performance Technology. The OEM provides a holistic model, which links what organizations apply, implement, produce, and deliver to the value-added impact that all of these elements have on external clients and society. Kaufman's theory laid a solid foundation for other performance technologists, and gave a profound implication for those scholars in this field.