临床误诊误治
臨床誤診誤治
림상오진오치
CLINICAL MISDIAGNOSIS & MISTHERAPY
2015年
1期
94-98
,共5页
李建%宋婷婷%马龙%钟华%于湘友
李建%宋婷婷%馬龍%鐘華%于湘友
리건%송정정%마룡%종화%우상우
支气管镜%支气管肺泡灌洗%颅脑损伤%并发症%呼吸道感染
支氣管鏡%支氣管肺泡灌洗%顱腦損傷%併髮癥%呼吸道感染
지기관경%지기관폐포관세%로뇌손상%병발증%호흡도감염
Bronchoscope%Bronchoalveolar lavage%Traumatic brain injury%Complication%Respiratory tract infection
目的:观察支气管肺泡灌洗( bronchoalveolar lavage, BAL)治疗重型颅脑损伤合并肺部感染的效果及安全性。方法选择我院收治的重型颅脑损伤合并肺部感染患者78例,采用随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组各39例。两组均给予常规治疗,观察组于确诊肺部感染后首日即予BAL治疗。观察两组治疗前及治疗后1、3、5日血气分析指标[血氧分压( PaO2)、动脉血二氧化碳分压( PaCO2)、氧合指数( PaO2/FiO2)],炎性因子[白细胞介素-6( IL-6)、肿瘤坏死因子-α( TNF-α)]及预后指标[机械通气天数、重症监护病房( ICU)住院天数、抗生素使用天数、肺部感染持续时间及28 d病死率]的变化,并记录并发症发生情况。结果两组治疗后PaO2、PaCO2、PaO2/FiO2、IL-6、TNF-α均较治疗前改善,且治疗后各时间点上述指标均优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组机械通气天数、ICU住院天数、抗生素使用天数、肺部感染持续时间均显著短于对照组( P<0.05),两组28 d病死率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组无严重BAL相关并发症发生。结论 BAL治疗可显著改善重型颅脑损伤合并肺部感染患者氧合功能,控制肺部炎症。
目的:觀察支氣管肺泡灌洗( bronchoalveolar lavage, BAL)治療重型顱腦損傷閤併肺部感染的效果及安全性。方法選擇我院收治的重型顱腦損傷閤併肺部感染患者78例,採用隨機數字錶法分為觀察組和對照組各39例。兩組均給予常規治療,觀察組于確診肺部感染後首日即予BAL治療。觀察兩組治療前及治療後1、3、5日血氣分析指標[血氧分壓( PaO2)、動脈血二氧化碳分壓( PaCO2)、氧閤指數( PaO2/FiO2)],炎性因子[白細胞介素-6( IL-6)、腫瘤壞死因子-α( TNF-α)]及預後指標[機械通氣天數、重癥鑑護病房( ICU)住院天數、抗生素使用天數、肺部感染持續時間及28 d病死率]的變化,併記錄併髮癥髮生情況。結果兩組治療後PaO2、PaCO2、PaO2/FiO2、IL-6、TNF-α均較治療前改善,且治療後各時間點上述指標均優于對照組,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。觀察組機械通氣天數、ICU住院天數、抗生素使用天數、肺部感染持續時間均顯著短于對照組( P<0.05),兩組28 d病死率比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。觀察組無嚴重BAL相關併髮癥髮生。結論 BAL治療可顯著改善重型顱腦損傷閤併肺部感染患者氧閤功能,控製肺部炎癥。
목적:관찰지기관폐포관세( bronchoalveolar lavage, BAL)치료중형로뇌손상합병폐부감염적효과급안전성。방법선택아원수치적중형로뇌손상합병폐부감염환자78례,채용수궤수자표법분위관찰조화대조조각39례。량조균급여상규치료,관찰조우학진폐부감염후수일즉여BAL치료。관찰량조치료전급치료후1、3、5일혈기분석지표[혈양분압( PaO2)、동맥혈이양화탄분압( PaCO2)、양합지수( PaO2/FiO2)],염성인자[백세포개소-6( IL-6)、종류배사인자-α( TNF-α)]급예후지표[궤계통기천수、중증감호병방( ICU)주원천수、항생소사용천수、폐부감염지속시간급28 d병사솔]적변화,병기록병발증발생정황。결과량조치료후PaO2、PaCO2、PaO2/FiO2、IL-6、TNF-α균교치료전개선,차치료후각시간점상술지표균우우대조조,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。관찰조궤계통기천수、ICU주원천수、항생소사용천수、폐부감염지속시간균현저단우대조조( P<0.05),량조28 d병사솔비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。관찰조무엄중BAL상관병발증발생。결론 BAL치료가현저개선중형로뇌손상합병폐부감염환자양합공능,공제폐부염증。
Objective To observe the effects and safety of bronchoalveolar lavage ( BAL) in patients with pulmonary infection after severe traumatic brain injury. Methods Patients were randomly divided into the treatment group and the con-trol group (n=39, each) using random digit table. All the patients were treated with conventional therapy, and the treatment group was treated with BAL besides conventional therapy. Results The results of blood gas analysis showed that the levels of PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2 in the treatment group were significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0. 05), while the lev-el of PaO2 was significantly lower than that of the control group ( P<0. 05 ) . Compared with the control group at the same time, the plasma IL-6 and TNF-αlevels were obviously lower than those before treatment, and the levels were decreased more significantly in the treatment group than that in the control group. Duration of ICU stay, days of antibiotic use, and days of mechanical ventilation were significantly fewer in the treatment group than that in the control group. There was no significant difference in mortality rate between the two groups (P>0. 05). There was no serious BAL related complications in the treat-ment group. Conclusion The BAL can significantly increase the oxygenation, control the pulmonary infection.