针灸推拿医学（英文版）
針灸推拿醫學（英文版）
침구추나의학（영문판）
JOURNAL OF ACUPUNCTURE AND TUINA SCIENCE
2015年
1期
32-35
,共4页
针刺疗法%电针%水针%穴位注射%坐骨神经痛
針刺療法%電針%水針%穴位註射%坐骨神經痛
침자요법%전침%수침%혈위주사%좌골신경통
Acupuncture Therapy%Electroacupuncture%Hydro-acupuncture%Acupoint-injection%Sciatica
目的：观察电针加穴位注射治疗根性坐骨神经痛的临床疗效。方法：将114例患者随机分为观察组和对照组，每组57例。观察组采用电针加腺苷钴胺穴位注射治疗，对照组采用双氯芬酸钠缓释片口服加腺苷钴胺肌肉注射治疗，治疗1个疗程后比较两组之间的临床疗效。结果：观察组总有效率96.5%，对照组总有效率91.2%，两者差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)；观察组痊愈率57.9%，对照组为21.1%，两组痊愈率差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05)；治疗结束后第4天随访，观察组的复发率为23.1%，对照组为47.9%，两者具有统计学差异(P＜0.05)。结论：电针加穴位注射治疗根性坐骨神经痛的临床效果显著，值得临床推广。
目的：觀察電針加穴位註射治療根性坐骨神經痛的臨床療效。方法：將114例患者隨機分為觀察組和對照組，每組57例。觀察組採用電針加腺苷鈷胺穴位註射治療，對照組採用雙氯芬痠鈉緩釋片口服加腺苷鈷胺肌肉註射治療，治療1箇療程後比較兩組之間的臨床療效。結果：觀察組總有效率96.5%，對照組總有效率91.2%，兩者差異無統計學意義(P＞0.05)；觀察組痊愈率57.9%，對照組為21.1%，兩組痊愈率差異有統計學意義(P＜0.05)；治療結束後第4天隨訪，觀察組的複髮率為23.1%，對照組為47.9%，兩者具有統計學差異(P＜0.05)。結論：電針加穴位註射治療根性坐骨神經痛的臨床效果顯著，值得臨床推廣。
목적：관찰전침가혈위주사치료근성좌골신경통적림상료효。방법：장114례환자수궤분위관찰조화대조조，매조57례。관찰조채용전침가선감고알혈위주사치료，대조조채용쌍록분산납완석편구복가선감고알기육주사치료，치료1개료정후비교량조지간적림상료효。결과：관찰조총유효솔96.5%，대조조총유효솔91.2%，량자차이무통계학의의(P＞0.05)；관찰조전유솔57.9%，대조조위21.1%，량조전유솔차이유통계학의의(P＜0.05)；치료결속후제4천수방，관찰조적복발솔위23.1%，대조조위47.9%，량자구유통계학차이(P＜0.05)。결론：전침가혈위주사치료근성좌골신경통적림상효과현저，치득림상추엄。
Objective:To observe the clinical effects of electroacupuncture (EA) plus acuoint-injection for nerve root sciatica. <br> Methods:A total of 114 cases were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, 57 cases in each group. The observation group was given EA plus acupoint-injection therapy with Cobamamide. The control group was given oral administration of Diclofenac Sodium Sustained-release Tablets plus muscular injection of Cobamamide. After one-course treatment, the clinical effects were compared between the two groups. <br> Results:The total effective rate was 96.5%in the observation group and 91.2%in the control group, without a statistical significance in the difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The curative rate was 57.9%in the observation group and 21.1% in the control group, with a statistical significance in the difference between the two groups (P<0.05). In the follow-up on the fourth day after the treatment, the recurrence rate was 23.1%in the observation group and 47.9%in the control group, with statistical difference between the two groups (P<0.05). <br> Conclusion: EA plus acupoint-injection therapy for sciatica of nerve roots is remarkable in the clinical effect and needs promotion in clinic.
