世界最新医学信息文摘(连续型电子期刊)
世界最新醫學信息文摘(連續型電子期刊)
세계최신의학신식문적(련속형전자기간)
World Latest Medicine Information
2014年
34期
14-14,17
,共2页
尿毒症%血液灌流%血液透析%治疗效果
尿毒癥%血液灌流%血液透析%治療效果
뇨독증%혈액관류%혈액투석%치료효과
uremia%blood perfusion%blood dialysis%treatment effect
目的:探讨血液灌流联合血液透析治疗尿毒症的临床效果。方法回顾性分析了2012年12月~2013年12月我院收治的68例尿毒症患者的临床资料,随机分为观察组和对照组,观察组采用血液灌流联合血液透析治疗,对照组给予血液透析治疗。比对两组治疗效果及临床症状改善情况。结果观察组治疗前后 scr、β2-MG、PtH、BUn 水平降低差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。对照组 scr、BUn 治疗前后差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。观察组治疗前后食欲、皮肤瘙痒、睡眠等症状改变比对照组明显,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论血液灌流联合血液透析治疗尿毒症临床效果较好,能明显改善临床症状,值得推广。
目的:探討血液灌流聯閤血液透析治療尿毒癥的臨床效果。方法迴顧性分析瞭2012年12月~2013年12月我院收治的68例尿毒癥患者的臨床資料,隨機分為觀察組和對照組,觀察組採用血液灌流聯閤血液透析治療,對照組給予血液透析治療。比對兩組治療效果及臨床癥狀改善情況。結果觀察組治療前後 scr、β2-MG、PtH、BUn 水平降低差異有統計學意義(P <0.05)。對照組 scr、BUn 治療前後差異有統計學意義(P <0.05)。觀察組治療前後食欲、皮膚瘙癢、睡眠等癥狀改變比對照組明顯,兩組比較差異有統計學意義(P <0.05)。結論血液灌流聯閤血液透析治療尿毒癥臨床效果較好,能明顯改善臨床癥狀,值得推廣。
목적:탐토혈액관류연합혈액투석치료뇨독증적림상효과。방법회고성분석료2012년12월~2013년12월아원수치적68례뇨독증환자적림상자료,수궤분위관찰조화대조조,관찰조채용혈액관류연합혈액투석치료,대조조급여혈액투석치료。비대량조치료효과급림상증상개선정황。결과관찰조치료전후 scr、β2-MG、PtH、BUn 수평강저차이유통계학의의(P <0.05)。대조조 scr、BUn 치료전후차이유통계학의의(P <0.05)。관찰조치료전후식욕、피부소양、수면등증상개변비대조조명현,량조비교차이유통계학의의(P <0.05)。결론혈액관류연합혈액투석치료뇨독증림상효과교호,능명현개선림상증상,치득추엄。
Objective to investigate the clinical efficacy of hemoperfusion combined with hemodialysis for uremia. Methods retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 68 cases of 2012 decembe to 2013 december in uremic patients in our hospital, were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group, the observation group with hemoperfusion combined with hemodialysis therapy, the control group were given hemodialysis treatment. a comparison of two treatment group and clinical symptoms improve. Results observation group before and after the treatment of scr, beta 2 - MG, PtH, BUn level to reduce the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). the control scr, BUn, before and after treatment difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). observation group before and after treatment of appetite, skin itching, symptoms such as sleep change than the control group obviously, the more similar between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion the blood perfusion combined with uremia hemodialysis treatment effect is good, can significantly improve the clinical symptoms, is worth promoting.