岭南急诊医学杂志
嶺南急診醫學雜誌
령남급진의학잡지
LINGNAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
2014年
6期
462-464
,共3页
巴音吉力%陈勍%黄妙玲%管媚媚%刘畅浩%田维杰
巴音吉力%陳勍%黃妙玲%管媚媚%劉暢浩%田維傑
파음길력%진경%황묘령%관미미%류창호%전유걸
宫腔粘连%节育环%球囊支架%INTERCEED 防粘连膜
宮腔粘連%節育環%毬囊支架%INTERCEED 防粘連膜
궁강점련%절육배%구낭지가%INTERCEED 방점련막
intrauterine adhesions%IUD%Foley catheter%interceed absorbable adhesion barrier
目的:总结宫腔粘连分离术后宫内节育环、INTERCEED 防粘连膜+宫内节育器(Interceed)及球囊支架预防再粘连的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2010年1月至2013年12月收治的589例宫腔粘连分离术患者的临床资料,以术中宫腔放置节育器(IUD)为对照组(n=202),宫腔放置 INTERCEED 为观察组 A(n=199),宫腔放置球囊支架为观察组B (n=188),术后3个月复查宫腔镜了解宫腔形态恢复情况及术后半年随访月经改善情况。结果:三组对轻中度宫腔粘连患者的有效率无明显差异(P >0.05);观察组 A、观察组 B 对重度宫腔粘连患者的有效率均明显高于对照组(P <0.05);术后半年随访,观察组 A、观察组 B 对月经量改善的有效率均明显高于对照组(P <0.05)。结论:对于轻中度宫腔粘连患者,3种材料预防再粘连效果无明显差异,而对于重度宫腔粘连患者,INTERCEED 与球囊支架均能显著减少术后再粘连的发生,效果均优于节育环,而INTERCEED与球囊支架无明显差异。
目的:總結宮腔粘連分離術後宮內節育環、INTERCEED 防粘連膜+宮內節育器(Interceed)及毬囊支架預防再粘連的療效。方法:迴顧性分析2010年1月至2013年12月收治的589例宮腔粘連分離術患者的臨床資料,以術中宮腔放置節育器(IUD)為對照組(n=202),宮腔放置 INTERCEED 為觀察組 A(n=199),宮腔放置毬囊支架為觀察組B (n=188),術後3箇月複查宮腔鏡瞭解宮腔形態恢複情況及術後半年隨訪月經改善情況。結果:三組對輕中度宮腔粘連患者的有效率無明顯差異(P >0.05);觀察組 A、觀察組 B 對重度宮腔粘連患者的有效率均明顯高于對照組(P <0.05);術後半年隨訪,觀察組 A、觀察組 B 對月經量改善的有效率均明顯高于對照組(P <0.05)。結論:對于輕中度宮腔粘連患者,3種材料預防再粘連效果無明顯差異,而對于重度宮腔粘連患者,INTERCEED 與毬囊支架均能顯著減少術後再粘連的髮生,效果均優于節育環,而INTERCEED與毬囊支架無明顯差異。
목적:총결궁강점련분리술후궁내절육배、INTERCEED 방점련막+궁내절육기(Interceed)급구낭지가예방재점련적료효。방법:회고성분석2010년1월지2013년12월수치적589례궁강점련분리술환자적림상자료,이술중궁강방치절육기(IUD)위대조조(n=202),궁강방치 INTERCEED 위관찰조 A(n=199),궁강방치구낭지가위관찰조B (n=188),술후3개월복사궁강경료해궁강형태회복정황급술후반년수방월경개선정황。결과:삼조대경중도궁강점련환자적유효솔무명현차이(P >0.05);관찰조 A、관찰조 B 대중도궁강점련환자적유효솔균명현고우대조조(P <0.05);술후반년수방,관찰조 A、관찰조 B 대월경량개선적유효솔균명현고우대조조(P <0.05)。결론:대우경중도궁강점련환자,3충재료예방재점련효과무명현차이,이대우중도궁강점련환자,INTERCEED 여구낭지가균능현저감소술후재점련적발생,효과균우우절육배,이INTERCEED여구낭지가무명현차이。
Objective: To summarize the effects of intrauterine device (IUD)、Foley catheter and Interceed absorbable adhesion barrier on preventing adhesion recurrence after transcervical resection for intrauterine adhesions;Methods:The clinical data of 589 patients with intrauterine adhesions underwent transcervical resection from Jan 2010 to Dec 2013 were retrospectively studied. 202 cases palced with IUD as control group,199cases placed Interceed as the observation group A,and 188 cases placed Foley catheter uterine as the observation group B, the three group were reviewed hysteroscopy to understand uterine recovery after 3 months and menstruation after half year. Results: Patients with mild or moderate and IUA, the effective rate were no significant differences among the three groups (P >0.05). Patients with serious IUA,the effective rate in the observation group A and group B were significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The improving rate of menses in the observation group A and group B were significantly higher than that in the control group after postoperative six months. Conclusion: There are no differences between the three methods in patients with mild and moderate IUA,but in patients with serious IUA, Foley catheter and Interceed are superior to IUD for preventing re adhesions after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis.