中国实用医药
中國實用醫藥
중국실용의약
CHINA PRACTICAL MEDICAL
2015年
7期
35-36
,共2页
D-二聚体%检测%比较分析
D-二聚體%檢測%比較分析
D-이취체%검측%비교분석
D-dimer%Detectoin%Comparative analysis
目的:对本院实验室采用的两种定量D-二聚体测定方法进行比较分析。方法随机抽取100例患者标本,分别采用干式免疫散射色谱法和免疫比浊法对其D-二聚体含量时行测定,即每天抽取20例,连续测定5 d,然后对两种方法的测定结果进行比较分析。结果两种检测方法测定的结果经比较分析,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论两种检测方法相关性良好,但两种方法各有优缺,应根据实验室实际情况选择合适的方法。
目的:對本院實驗室採用的兩種定量D-二聚體測定方法進行比較分析。方法隨機抽取100例患者標本,分彆採用榦式免疫散射色譜法和免疫比濁法對其D-二聚體含量時行測定,即每天抽取20例,連續測定5 d,然後對兩種方法的測定結果進行比較分析。結果兩種檢測方法測定的結果經比較分析,差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論兩種檢測方法相關性良好,但兩種方法各有優缺,應根據實驗室實際情況選擇閤適的方法。
목적:대본원실험실채용적량충정량D-이취체측정방법진행비교분석。방법수궤추취100례환자표본,분별채용간식면역산사색보법화면역비탁법대기D-이취체함량시행측정,즉매천추취20례,련속측정5 d,연후대량충방법적측정결과진행비교분석。결과량충검측방법측정적결과경비교분석,차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론량충검측방법상관성량호,단량충방법각유우결,응근거실험실실제정황선택합괄적방법。
Objective To compare the two quantitative D-dimer detection methods in laboratory of our hospital. Methods Random selection was made on 100 patient samples, and dry scattering immune chromatography and immunoturbidimetry were applied for detection of D-dimer, by process of 20 samples per day for 5 d. The results of the two methods were compared and analyzed. Results There was no statistically significant difference of detection results between the two methods (P>0.05). Conclusion Two methods have good correlation, while they have their own advantages and disadvantages. Suitable method should be determined by practical condition of laboratory.