临床和实验医学杂志
臨床和實驗醫學雜誌
림상화실험의학잡지
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
2015年
1期
53-56
,共4页
根管预备%根管治疗%磨牙%ProTaper%机用器械
根管預備%根管治療%磨牙%ProTaper%機用器械
근관예비%근관치료%마아%ProTaper%궤용기계
Root canal preparation%Root canal treatment%Molar%Rotary ProTaper file%K file
目的:评价机用 ProTaper 镍钛根管器械行磨牙根管预备的临床疗效。方法2011年1月至2013年12月选取患有磨牙牙髓炎或根尖周炎的患者99例,共116颗磨牙;随机分为实验组(49例,58颗牙)和对照组(50例,58颗牙)。对照组用不锈钢 K 型锉预备根管,实验组用机用镍钛器 ProTaper 根管锉预备根管。充填根管过程两组患者均采用侧向加压法。根据 X 线片评价根管预备和充填效果,且记录每颗患牙的单个根管预备所用时间、术后不良反应及远期疗效。结果与对照组相比,机用 ProTaper 镍钛器械预备单根管所耗时间短,根管预备后疼痛发生率低,根管适充率高,根管治疗术后1年疗效好。结论使用机用 ProTaper 器械进行恒磨牙根管预备快速、高效,根充效果好,术后疼痛少,值得临床推广。
目的:評價機用 ProTaper 鎳鈦根管器械行磨牙根管預備的臨床療效。方法2011年1月至2013年12月選取患有磨牙牙髓炎或根尖週炎的患者99例,共116顆磨牙;隨機分為實驗組(49例,58顆牙)和對照組(50例,58顆牙)。對照組用不鏽鋼 K 型銼預備根管,實驗組用機用鎳鈦器 ProTaper 根管銼預備根管。充填根管過程兩組患者均採用側嚮加壓法。根據 X 線片評價根管預備和充填效果,且記錄每顆患牙的單箇根管預備所用時間、術後不良反應及遠期療效。結果與對照組相比,機用 ProTaper 鎳鈦器械預備單根管所耗時間短,根管預備後疼痛髮生率低,根管適充率高,根管治療術後1年療效好。結論使用機用 ProTaper 器械進行恆磨牙根管預備快速、高效,根充效果好,術後疼痛少,值得臨床推廣。
목적:평개궤용 ProTaper 얼태근관기계행마아근관예비적림상료효。방법2011년1월지2013년12월선취환유마아아수염혹근첨주염적환자99례,공116과마아;수궤분위실험조(49례,58과아)화대조조(50례,58과아)。대조조용불수강 K 형촤예비근관,실험조용궤용얼태기 ProTaper 근관촤예비근관。충전근관과정량조환자균채용측향가압법。근거 X 선편평개근관예비화충전효과,차기록매과환아적단개근관예비소용시간、술후불량반응급원기료효。결과여대조조상비,궤용 ProTaper 얼태기계예비단근관소모시간단,근관예비후동통발생솔저,근관괄충솔고,근관치료술후1년료효호。결론사용궤용 ProTaper 기계진행항마아근관예비쾌속、고효,근충효과호,술후동통소,치득림상추엄。
Objective To evaluate the quality of molar root canal preparation using ProTaper rotary instruments. Methods From January 2011 to December 2013,99 adult patients with 116 affected molars who were diagnosed to receive root canal treatment were divided into two groups based on the randomly - paired principle. There were 58 teeth in each group. In group A,root canals were prepared with rotary ProTaper files in crown - down mode,and in group B root canals were prepared with traditional stainless steel K files by hand. All root canals were obturated with lateral condensation method. The time consumed in preparation of each canal was recorded. The outcome of root filling and side effects occurred af-ter the operation were also noted. 1 year later all the cases were revisited and the therapeutic results were verified. Results Time consumed in the preparation of group A was significantly less than group B. Exact filling rate of canals prepared with rotary ProTaper files was higher than with k files and side effects after the operation such as tooth ache and swelling less occurred. One year post operational follow - up survey showed better therapeutic effects of root canal treatment in the group using rotary ProTaper files. Conclusion Compared with instrumentation with traditional stainless steel K files by hand,molar root canal preparation with rotary ProTaper files is less time consuming and more convenient. The occurrence of side effects was less and the outcome of root filling was more satisfactory.