医学理论与实践
醫學理論與實踐
의학이론여실천
The Journal of Medical Theory and Practice
2015年
1期
6-7,10
,共3页
后腹腔镜%肾肿瘤%肾部分切除术
後腹腔鏡%腎腫瘤%腎部分切除術
후복강경%신종류%신부분절제술
Retroperitoneoscopy%Renal tumor%Partial nephrectomy
目的:探讨后腹腔镜治疗肾肿瘤的疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性分析我院2010年4月-2013年1月收治的61例肾肿瘤患者临床资料,按治疗术式分为RLPN组(后腹腔镜肾部分切除术)和OPN组(开放性肾部分切除术)。比较两组患者手术时间、阻断时间、术中出血量、引流量、拔管时间、术后住院时间、肠道恢复时间、血清肌酐、患侧GFR以及并发症发生情况。结果:RLPN组患者除阻断时间和手术时间高于OPN组患者外,术中出血量、引流量、拔管时间、术后住院时间和肠道恢复时间均低于OPN组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者患侧GFR术后较术前均有较大改善,差异均有统计学意义( P<0.05)。两组患者并发症及复发情况对比差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.374, P>0.05)。结论:后腹腔镜治疗肾肿瘤难度高于传统开放性术式,安全性相近,但其创伤小、恢复快,治疗效果明显较好。
目的:探討後腹腔鏡治療腎腫瘤的療效和安全性。方法:迴顧性分析我院2010年4月-2013年1月收治的61例腎腫瘤患者臨床資料,按治療術式分為RLPN組(後腹腔鏡腎部分切除術)和OPN組(開放性腎部分切除術)。比較兩組患者手術時間、阻斷時間、術中齣血量、引流量、拔管時間、術後住院時間、腸道恢複時間、血清肌酐、患側GFR以及併髮癥髮生情況。結果:RLPN組患者除阻斷時間和手術時間高于OPN組患者外,術中齣血量、引流量、拔管時間、術後住院時間和腸道恢複時間均低于OPN組,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。兩組患者患側GFR術後較術前均有較大改善,差異均有統計學意義( P<0.05)。兩組患者併髮癥及複髮情況對比差異無統計學意義(χ2=1.374, P>0.05)。結論:後腹腔鏡治療腎腫瘤難度高于傳統開放性術式,安全性相近,但其創傷小、恢複快,治療效果明顯較好。
목적:탐토후복강경치료신종류적료효화안전성。방법:회고성분석아원2010년4월-2013년1월수치적61례신종류환자림상자료,안치료술식분위RLPN조(후복강경신부분절제술)화OPN조(개방성신부분절제술)。비교량조환자수술시간、조단시간、술중출혈량、인류량、발관시간、술후주원시간、장도회복시간、혈청기항、환측GFR이급병발증발생정황。결과:RLPN조환자제조단시간화수술시간고우OPN조환자외,술중출혈량、인류량、발관시간、술후주원시간화장도회복시간균저우OPN조,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。량조환자환측GFR술후교술전균유교대개선,차이균유통계학의의( P<0.05)。량조환자병발증급복발정황대비차이무통계학의의(χ2=1.374, P>0.05)。결론:후복강경치료신종류난도고우전통개방성술식,안전성상근,단기창상소、회복쾌,치료효과명현교호。
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety in retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor .Methods:Clinical data of 61 cases of patients from April 2010 to January 2013 in our hospital were retrospective‐ly analysed ,and were divided into RLPN group and OPN group .Operation time ,blocking time ,amount of bleeding , drainage ,extubation time ,postoperative hospitalization time ,intestinal recovery time ,serum creatinine ,the ipsilateral GFR and complications were compared .Results:Patients in group RLPN except for the blocking time and operation time is higher than that of group OPN ,the amount of intraoperative bleeding ,drainage ,extubation time ,postoperative hospitalization time and intestinal recovery time were lower than those of OPN group patients(P<0 .05) .Two groups of patients with ipsilateral GFR after operation were greatly improved(P<0 .05) .No statistically significant difference between the two groups of patients with recurrent complications level comparison(χ2 =1 .374 ,P>0 .05).Conclusion:Retroperitoneal laparoscopy for renal tumor is higher than that of the traditional open operation ,safety their natures are much the same ,but its small trauma ,quick recovery ,the treatment effect is obvious better .