南京林业大学学报(人文社会科学版)
南京林業大學學報(人文社會科學版)
남경임업대학학보(인문사회과학판)
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY(HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION)
2014年
4期
2-7
,共6页
资源危机%解决%技术%制度%可持续发展
資源危機%解決%技術%製度%可持續髮展
자원위궤%해결%기술%제도%가지속발전
resource crisis%resolution%technology%institution%sustainable development
通过技术进步不一定能够找到替代资源,而且即使能够找到,也要将经济活动限制在生态承载力之内,如此,就应该大力发展稳态经济;通过技术进步肯定能提高资源的利用率,一定程度上减少了资源利用,但是,如果不改变消费主义文化和市场经济资本逻辑,技术进步只可能增加资源消耗,加剧资源危机,鉴此,应该大力发展非物质经济;资源危机并不必然带来技术进步,只有进行制度变革,创造良好的社会环境,才能有利于技术创新和资源危机的解决;在解决资源危机这一问题上,技术进步在很多时候并不一定比制度变革更有利。总之,对于资源危机的解决,制度设置及其贯彻比技术进步及其应用更重要,应该更加重视通过制度变革而不是单纯通过技术创新来解决资源危机。
通過技術進步不一定能夠找到替代資源,而且即使能夠找到,也要將經濟活動限製在生態承載力之內,如此,就應該大力髮展穩態經濟;通過技術進步肯定能提高資源的利用率,一定程度上減少瞭資源利用,但是,如果不改變消費主義文化和市場經濟資本邏輯,技術進步隻可能增加資源消耗,加劇資源危機,鑒此,應該大力髮展非物質經濟;資源危機併不必然帶來技術進步,隻有進行製度變革,創造良好的社會環境,纔能有利于技術創新和資源危機的解決;在解決資源危機這一問題上,技術進步在很多時候併不一定比製度變革更有利。總之,對于資源危機的解決,製度設置及其貫徹比技術進步及其應用更重要,應該更加重視通過製度變革而不是單純通過技術創新來解決資源危機。
통과기술진보불일정능구조도체대자원,이차즉사능구조도,야요장경제활동한제재생태승재력지내,여차,취응해대력발전은태경제;통과기술진보긍정능제고자원적이용솔,일정정도상감소료자원이용,단시,여과불개변소비주의문화화시장경제자본라집,기술진보지가능증가자원소모,가극자원위궤,감차,응해대력발전비물질경제;자원위궤병불필연대래기술진보,지유진행제도변혁,창조량호적사회배경,재능유리우기술창신화자원위궤적해결;재해결자원위궤저일문제상,기술진보재흔다시후병불일정비제도변혁경유리。총지,대우자원위궤적해결,제도설치급기관철비기술진보급기응용경중요,응해경가중시통과제도변혁이불시단순통과기술창신래해결자원위궤。
Technological progress may not find alternative resource. Although alternatives may be found, economic activity should still be constrained within the ecological capacity. Thus, we should strive to develop stable economy. Technological progress is bound to increase the efficiency of resources, which, to some extent, decreases the use of recourses. However, the consumerism culture and the capital logic of market economy remain unchanged, technological progress can merely increase resource consumption and aggravate the resource crisis. Thus, we need to strive to develop non?material economy. Resource crisis does not necessarily lead to technological progress. Only with the institutional reform and benign social environment can technological progress be achieved and the resource crisis be resolved. In many cases, the technological approach hardly shows advantage over the institutional reform in terms of resource crisis resolution. In this sense, institution is more important than technology, and therefore, we should put emphasis on institutional reform rather than technological innovation for resolving the resource crisis.