中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2015年
1期
47-49
,共3页
老年人%抑郁症%护理%中西医结合%归侨
老年人%抑鬱癥%護理%中西醫結閤%歸僑
노년인%억욱증%호리%중서의결합%귀교
Elderly%Depression%Nursing care%Integrative medicine%Returned overseas Chinese
目的：探讨中西医结合护理干预对归侨老年抑郁症患者的效果。方法选择归侨老年抑郁症门诊患者71例，采用随机数字表法分为对照组（ n＝36）和干预组（ n＝35）。对照组采取一般常规护理方法，干预组采取中医辨证分型、情志调摄、饮食调理等中西医结合护理方法。采用老年抑郁量表（GDS）和社会支持评定量表（SSRS）比较两组干预效果。结果治疗6个月后，干预组患者GDS得分（12．71±7．31）分，对照组为（14．45±6．33）分，差异有统计学意义（t＝4．87，P＜0．01）；干预组48．6％患者评定为无抑郁，高于对照组19．5％，两组比较差异有统计学意义（χ2＝6．89，P＜0．05）；干预组SSRS得分为（5．52±0．72）分高于对照组的（4．89±0．87）分，差异有统计学意义（ t＝5．02，P＜0．01）。结论运用中医辨证饮食调理与情志调摄等中西医结合方法护理归侨老年抑郁症较一般常规护理方法效果好，可在临床推广。
目的：探討中西醫結閤護理榦預對歸僑老年抑鬱癥患者的效果。方法選擇歸僑老年抑鬱癥門診患者71例，採用隨機數字錶法分為對照組（ n＝36）和榦預組（ n＝35）。對照組採取一般常規護理方法，榦預組採取中醫辨證分型、情誌調攝、飲食調理等中西醫結閤護理方法。採用老年抑鬱量錶（GDS）和社會支持評定量錶（SSRS）比較兩組榦預效果。結果治療6箇月後，榦預組患者GDS得分（12．71±7．31）分，對照組為（14．45±6．33）分，差異有統計學意義（t＝4．87，P＜0．01）；榦預組48．6％患者評定為無抑鬱，高于對照組19．5％，兩組比較差異有統計學意義（χ2＝6．89，P＜0．05）；榦預組SSRS得分為（5．52±0．72）分高于對照組的（4．89±0．87）分，差異有統計學意義（ t＝5．02，P＜0．01）。結論運用中醫辨證飲食調理與情誌調攝等中西醫結閤方法護理歸僑老年抑鬱癥較一般常規護理方法效果好，可在臨床推廣。
목적：탐토중서의결합호리간예대귀교노년억욱증환자적효과。방법선택귀교노년억욱증문진환자71례，채용수궤수자표법분위대조조（ n＝36）화간예조（ n＝35）。대조조채취일반상규호리방법，간예조채취중의변증분형、정지조섭、음식조리등중서의결합호리방법。채용노년억욱량표（GDS）화사회지지평정량표（SSRS）비교량조간예효과。결과치료6개월후，간예조환자GDS득분（12．71±7．31）분，대조조위（14．45±6．33）분，차이유통계학의의（t＝4．87，P＜0．01）；간예조48．6％환자평정위무억욱，고우대조조19．5％，량조비교차이유통계학의의（χ2＝6．89，P＜0．05）；간예조SSRS득분위（5．52±0．72）분고우대조조적（4．89±0．87）분，차이유통계학의의（ t＝5．02，P＜0．01）。결론운용중의변증음식조리여정지조섭등중서의결합방법호리귀교노년억욱증교일반상규호리방법효과호，가재림상추엄。
Objective To explore nursing intervention of integrative medicine on returned overseas Chinese elderly with depression .Methods A total of 71 elderly with depression were divided into control group (n=36) and intervention group (n =35) randomly.The control group received routine nursing while the intervention group underwent serval integrative medicine nursing intervention such as syndrome differentiation types, emotional adjustment, and dietetic regulation.We utilized the Geriatric Depression Scale ( GDS) and Social Support Rating Scale ( SSRS) and compared the result of nursing intervention .Results After 6 months, the scores of GDS in the intervention group was (12.71 ±7.31) while the control group was (14.45 ±6.33) with statistical significance (t=4.87,P<0.01).There was 48.6% of patients assessed as non-depression in the intervention group which was higher than the control group (19.5%) (χ2 =6.89,P<0.05).The score of SSRS in the intervention group acquired 5.52 ±0.72 higher than the control group (4.89 ±0.87) (t=5.02, P<0.01).Conclusions It is that integrative medicine nursing such as syndrome differentiation dietetic regulation and emotional adjustment is better than the normal nursing method and is worthy of promotion in clinic.
