烟草科技
煙草科技
연초과기
TOBACCO SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
2015年
1期
26-30
,共5页
雒振宁%时焦%王聪%陈强%张玉丰%王海波%徐宜民
雒振寧%時焦%王聰%陳彊%張玉豐%王海波%徐宜民
락진저%시초%왕총%진강%장옥봉%왕해파%서의민
晾晒烟%种质%烟草白粉病%抗性评价%聚类分析
晾曬煙%種質%煙草白粉病%抗性評價%聚類分析
량쇄연%충질%연초백분병%항성평개%취류분석
Air-cured and sun-cured tobaccos%Germplasm%Tobacco powdery mildew%Resistance evaluation%Cluster analysis
为了明确湖北晒晾烟地方种质对烟草白粉病的抗性,利用中国农业科学院烟草研究所保存的白粉病菌,在温室中采用人工喷雾接种方法对湖北的88份地方晒晾烟种质进行了鉴定。结果表明:不同晒晾烟种质对烟草白粉病的抗病性差异明显,88份种质材料中高抗13份,中抗39份,中感和高感均为18份。抗性最高的种质为LC04,ZX06和WF04,其相对抗病指数为0.99;抗性最差的FJY01和CY08,其相对抗病指数不足0.1。对不同抗病类型种质的抗病性差异显著性分析显示,不同抗病类型种质的病叶率、病情指数和相对病情指数均达到显著水平。利用DPS数据分析软件对88份种质进行聚类分析显示,在种质抗性反应谱系图上划分为高抗、中抗、中感和高感4类。
為瞭明確湖北曬晾煙地方種質對煙草白粉病的抗性,利用中國農業科學院煙草研究所保存的白粉病菌,在溫室中採用人工噴霧接種方法對湖北的88份地方曬晾煙種質進行瞭鑒定。結果錶明:不同曬晾煙種質對煙草白粉病的抗病性差異明顯,88份種質材料中高抗13份,中抗39份,中感和高感均為18份。抗性最高的種質為LC04,ZX06和WF04,其相對抗病指數為0.99;抗性最差的FJY01和CY08,其相對抗病指數不足0.1。對不同抗病類型種質的抗病性差異顯著性分析顯示,不同抗病類型種質的病葉率、病情指數和相對病情指數均達到顯著水平。利用DPS數據分析軟件對88份種質進行聚類分析顯示,在種質抗性反應譜繫圖上劃分為高抗、中抗、中感和高感4類。
위료명학호북쇄량연지방충질대연초백분병적항성,이용중국농업과학원연초연구소보존적백분병균,재온실중채용인공분무접충방법대호북적88빈지방쇄량연충질진행료감정。결과표명:불동쇄량연충질대연초백분병적항병성차이명현,88빈충질재료중고항13빈,중항39빈,중감화고감균위18빈。항성최고적충질위LC04,ZX06화WF04,기상대항병지수위0.99;항성최차적FJY01화CY08,기상대항병지수불족0.1。대불동항병류형충질적항병성차이현저성분석현시,불동항병류형충질적병협솔、병정지수화상대병정지수균체도현저수평。이용DPS수거분석연건대88빈충질진행취류분석현시,재충질항성반응보계도상화분위고항、중항、중감화고감4류。
In order to clarify the resistance of Hubei origin germplasms of air-cured and sun-cured tobaccos to powdery mildew, 88 germplasms of air-cured and sun-cured tobacco were evaluated in greenhouse by spraying inoculation with the fungal isolate kept by Tobacco Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. The results showed that the resistance to powdery mildew differed significantly, 13 were highly resistant (HR), 39 moderately resistant (MR), 18 moderately susceptible (MS), and 18 highly susceptible (HS) among the total 88 germplasms. The highest resistant ones were LC04, ZX06 and WF04, with relative resistant indexes of 0.99. The highest susceptible ones were FJY01 and CY08, with relative resistant indexes of less than 0.1. The results of variance analysis indicated that the differences of infected leaf ratio, disease index and relative resistant index reached significantly levels (p<0.05) between different resistant types. The 88 germplasms were clustered into HR, MR, MS and HS groups by DPS data analyzing software.