河南医学研究
河南醫學研究
하남의학연구
HENAN MEDICAL RESEARCH
2014年
12期
29-31
,共3页
点式直线偏振光照射%局部阻滞%棘上或棘间韧带炎
點式直線偏振光照射%跼部阻滯%棘上或棘間韌帶炎
점식직선편진광조사%국부조체%극상혹극간인대염
linear-polarized near-infrared light irradiation%local block%supraspinous and interspi-nous ligaments
目的::观察点式直线偏振光照射联合局部阻滞治疗棘上或棘间韧带炎的效果。方法:将52例棘上或棘间韧带炎患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,各26例。治疗组采用局部阻滞加点式直线偏振光照射,对照组采用单纯局部阻滞治疗,对两组患者的治疗效果进行分析。结果:两组患者治疗中、治疗后VAS评分较治疗前均有显著降低;治疗后治疗组VAS评分较对照组低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组治愈率明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组2个月后复发率较对照组低(P<0.05)。结论:点式直线偏振光近红外线照射联合局部阻滞治疗棘上或棘间韧带炎疗效更好,且不易复发,是治疗棘上或棘间韧带炎的一种安全有效方法。
目的::觀察點式直線偏振光照射聯閤跼部阻滯治療棘上或棘間韌帶炎的效果。方法:將52例棘上或棘間韌帶炎患者隨機分為治療組和對照組,各26例。治療組採用跼部阻滯加點式直線偏振光照射,對照組採用單純跼部阻滯治療,對兩組患者的治療效果進行分析。結果:兩組患者治療中、治療後VAS評分較治療前均有顯著降低;治療後治療組VAS評分較對照組低,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。治療組治愈率明顯優于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。治療組2箇月後複髮率較對照組低(P<0.05)。結論:點式直線偏振光近紅外線照射聯閤跼部阻滯治療棘上或棘間韌帶炎療效更好,且不易複髮,是治療棘上或棘間韌帶炎的一種安全有效方法。
목적::관찰점식직선편진광조사연합국부조체치료극상혹극간인대염적효과。방법:장52례극상혹극간인대염환자수궤분위치료조화대조조,각26례。치료조채용국부조체가점식직선편진광조사,대조조채용단순국부조체치료,대량조환자적치료효과진행분석。결과:량조환자치료중、치료후VAS평분교치료전균유현저강저;치료후치료조VAS평분교대조조저,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。치료조치유솔명현우우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。치료조2개월후복발솔교대조조저(P<0.05)。결론:점식직선편진광근홍외선조사연합국부조체치료극상혹극간인대염료효경호,차불역복발,시치료극상혹극간인대염적일충안전유효방법。
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of linear-polarized near-infrared light irradiation in conjunction with local block in the treatment of the patients with supraspinous or interspinous desmitis. Methods:Fifty-two patients with supraspinous or interspinous desmitis were randomly di-vided into the treatment group and the control group, twenty-six cases in each group. The patients in treatment group were treated with local block in conjunction with linear-polarized near-infrared light irradiation. The patients in control group were treated with local block only. The effects of the two groups were analyzed. Results:The VAS scores were decreased significantly after treatment in both two groups. Compared with the control group, the VAS score of the treatment group was low-er , the difference was statistically significant ( P<0 . 05 ) . The cure rate of the treatment group was significantly higher than the control group ( P<0 . 05 ) . The recurrence rate of the treatment group was significantly lower than the control group after two months ( P<0 . 05 ) . Conclusion: Linear-polarized near-infrared light irradiation in conjunction with local block in the treatment of spine in-jury on the supraspinous and interspinous ligaments was more effective and not easy to relapse. It was an effective and safe method to treat spine injury on the supraspinous or interspinous desmitis.