中国医药科学
中國醫藥科學
중국의약과학
CHINA MEDICINE AND PHARMACY
2014年
24期
57-58,72
,共3页
呼吸暂停%早产儿%枸橼酸咖啡因
呼吸暫停%早產兒%枸櫞痠咖啡因
호흡잠정%조산인%구연산가배인
Apnea%Prematurity%Caffeine citrate
目的：对比枸橼酸咖啡因与氨茶碱治疗早产儿原发性呼吸暂停的疗效。方法原发性早产儿呼吸暂停患儿59例，随机分为咖啡因组32例和氨茶碱组27例。对比两组患儿治疗总有效率及呼吸暂停终止时间。结果咖啡因组总有效率明显高于氨茶碱组（87.5％ vs 63.0％，x2=6.408，P=0.041），咖啡因组呼吸暂停终止时间明显短于氨茶碱组[（2.9±1.2）d vs（3.5±1.0）d，t=-2.063，P=0.044]。结论咖啡因治疗早产儿呼吸暂停疗效优于氨茶碱。
目的：對比枸櫞痠咖啡因與氨茶堿治療早產兒原髮性呼吸暫停的療效。方法原髮性早產兒呼吸暫停患兒59例，隨機分為咖啡因組32例和氨茶堿組27例。對比兩組患兒治療總有效率及呼吸暫停終止時間。結果咖啡因組總有效率明顯高于氨茶堿組（87.5％ vs 63.0％，x2=6.408，P=0.041），咖啡因組呼吸暫停終止時間明顯短于氨茶堿組[（2.9±1.2）d vs（3.5±1.0）d，t=-2.063，P=0.044]。結論咖啡因治療早產兒呼吸暫停療效優于氨茶堿。
목적：대비구연산가배인여안다감치료조산인원발성호흡잠정적료효。방법원발성조산인호흡잠정환인59례，수궤분위가배인조32례화안다감조27례。대비량조환인치료총유효솔급호흡잠정종지시간。결과가배인조총유효솔명현고우안다감조（87.5％ vs 63.0％，x2=6.408，P=0.041），가배인조호흡잠정종지시간명현단우안다감조[（2.9±1.2）d vs（3.5±1.0）d，t=-2.063，P=0.044]。결론가배인치료조산인호흡잠정료효우우안다감。
Objective To compare the effect of caffeine citrate and aminophylline in treatment of primary apnea of prematurity. Methods 59 cases of preterm infant with primary apnea were divided into two groups, the group treated by caffeine citrate(32 cases) and the group treated by aminophylline(27 cases). To compare the efficiency and apnea termination time between two groups. Results Compared with the aminophylline group, the total effective rate of the caffeine group was higher(87.5%vs 63%, x2=6.408, P=0.041), and the apnea termination time was shorter[(2.9±1.2)d vs (3.5±1.0)d, t=-2.063, P=0.044]. Conclusion Caffeine citrate is more effective than aminophylline in treatment of primary apnea of prematurity.
