临床和实验医学杂志
臨床和實驗醫學雜誌
림상화실험의학잡지
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
2015年
2期
130-132
,共3页
腰椎间盘突出%脊椎滑脱%手术治疗
腰椎間盤突齣%脊椎滑脫%手術治療
요추간반돌출%척추활탈%수술치료
Lumbar disc herniation%Spondylolisthesis%Surgery
目的:探讨腰椎间盘突出合并脊椎滑脱患者手术治疗方式及临床效果。方法选取于2010年1月至2013年11月间收治的腰椎间盘突出合并脊椎滑脱患者127例,分为观察组(71例)和对照组(56例)。观察组给予椎间盘镜下髓核摘除术治疗,对照组给予 MAST Quadrant 通道下髓核摘除术治疗,比较两组患者的临床疗效及预后情况。结果观察组与对照组患者术后视觉模拟评分( VAS)评分均明显低于术前( P <0.05),Oswestry 功能障碍指数问卷表(ODI)评分均明显高于术前,差异具有统计学意义( P <0.05);观察组与对照组临床有效率、手术持续时间、出血量、术后 VAS 评分及 ODI 评分比较均无明显差异,差异无统计学意义( P ﹥0.05)。结论椎间盘镜下髓核摘除术及 MAST Quadrant 通道下髓核摘除术均是治疗腰椎间盘突出合并脊椎滑脱的有效手段,且创伤较小,可以广泛应用于临床。
目的:探討腰椎間盤突齣閤併脊椎滑脫患者手術治療方式及臨床效果。方法選取于2010年1月至2013年11月間收治的腰椎間盤突齣閤併脊椎滑脫患者127例,分為觀察組(71例)和對照組(56例)。觀察組給予椎間盤鏡下髓覈摘除術治療,對照組給予 MAST Quadrant 通道下髓覈摘除術治療,比較兩組患者的臨床療效及預後情況。結果觀察組與對照組患者術後視覺模擬評分( VAS)評分均明顯低于術前( P <0.05),Oswestry 功能障礙指數問捲錶(ODI)評分均明顯高于術前,差異具有統計學意義( P <0.05);觀察組與對照組臨床有效率、手術持續時間、齣血量、術後 VAS 評分及 ODI 評分比較均無明顯差異,差異無統計學意義( P ﹥0.05)。結論椎間盤鏡下髓覈摘除術及 MAST Quadrant 通道下髓覈摘除術均是治療腰椎間盤突齣閤併脊椎滑脫的有效手段,且創傷較小,可以廣汎應用于臨床。
목적:탐토요추간반돌출합병척추활탈환자수술치료방식급림상효과。방법선취우2010년1월지2013년11월간수치적요추간반돌출합병척추활탈환자127례,분위관찰조(71례)화대조조(56례)。관찰조급여추간반경하수핵적제술치료,대조조급여 MAST Quadrant 통도하수핵적제술치료,비교량조환자적림상료효급예후정황。결과관찰조여대조조환자술후시각모의평분( VAS)평분균명현저우술전( P <0.05),Oswestry 공능장애지수문권표(ODI)평분균명현고우술전,차이구유통계학의의( P <0.05);관찰조여대조조림상유효솔、수술지속시간、출혈량、술후 VAS 평분급 ODI 평분비교균무명현차이,차이무통계학의의( P ﹥0.05)。결론추간반경하수핵적제술급 MAST Quadrant 통도하수핵적제술균시치료요추간반돌출합병척추활탈적유효수단,차창상교소,가이엄범응용우림상。
Objective To explore the clinical effect of surgical treatment of patients with lumbar disc herniation associated with spondylo-listhesis. Methods One hundred and twenty seven patients with lumbar disc herniation associated with spondylolisthesis treated in Orthopedic Hospital during January 2010 to November 2013 were divided into observation group(71 cases)and control group(56 cases),patients in observa-tion group were given with discectomy under discoscopy,patients in control group were given with discectomy under the MAST Quadrant channel, and the prognosis of patients in both groups had been compared. Results The VAS scores of patients in observation group and control group were significantly lower than those before operation( P < 0. 05),and their ODI scores were significantly higher than those before surgery( P < 0. 05), and the difference was statistically significant;and the difference in duration of surgery,amount of blood loss,postoperative VAS scores and ODI scores between observation group and control group was not statistically significant( P ﹥ 0. 05). Conclusion Endoscopic discectomy and MAST Quadrant channel discectomy are effective means with less invasiveness in treatment of patients with lumbar disc herniation associated with spon-dylolisthesis,hence they can be widely used in clinical practice.