中国现代医生
中國現代醫生
중국현대의생
CHINA MODERN DOCTOR
2015年
2期
8-10
,共3页
糖尿病%糖化低密度脂蛋白%血脂%血糖
糖尿病%糖化低密度脂蛋白%血脂%血糖
당뇨병%당화저밀도지단백%혈지%혈당
Diabetes%Glycated low density lipoprotein%Blood lipid%Blood sugar
目的：研究糖尿病患者血清糖化低密度脂蛋白水平,为糖尿病并发冠心病的预防提供理论依据。方法选取我院收治的110例糖尿病患者作为观察组,选取同时期进行健康体检的健康者110例作为对照组,检测两组患者血清中的血糖、三酰甘油、载脂蛋白、胆固醇、糖化低密度脂蛋白、糖化血红蛋白等。结果观察组患者的G-LDL水平明显高于对照组(P<0.05﹚；但两组apoB100、LDL-C水平对比无统计学差异(P>0.05﹚；apoA-I与HDL-C的水平明显低于对照组(P<0.05﹚；Clu、TG以及Chol水平明显高于对照组(P<0.05﹚。观察组的G-LDL水平与Glu呈正相关(r=0.631,P<0.05﹚,与LDL-C、HbA1c水平无相关关系(r=0.328、0.329,P>0.05﹚。结论糖尿病患者的血清糖化低密度脂蛋白水平显著提升,且与血糖值呈正相关关系。对评估糖尿病的治疗疗效有重要的临床价值。
目的：研究糖尿病患者血清糖化低密度脂蛋白水平,為糖尿病併髮冠心病的預防提供理論依據。方法選取我院收治的110例糖尿病患者作為觀察組,選取同時期進行健康體檢的健康者110例作為對照組,檢測兩組患者血清中的血糖、三酰甘油、載脂蛋白、膽固醇、糖化低密度脂蛋白、糖化血紅蛋白等。結果觀察組患者的G-LDL水平明顯高于對照組(P<0.05﹚；但兩組apoB100、LDL-C水平對比無統計學差異(P>0.05﹚；apoA-I與HDL-C的水平明顯低于對照組(P<0.05﹚；Clu、TG以及Chol水平明顯高于對照組(P<0.05﹚。觀察組的G-LDL水平與Glu呈正相關(r=0.631,P<0.05﹚,與LDL-C、HbA1c水平無相關關繫(r=0.328、0.329,P>0.05﹚。結論糖尿病患者的血清糖化低密度脂蛋白水平顯著提升,且與血糖值呈正相關關繫。對評估糖尿病的治療療效有重要的臨床價值。
목적：연구당뇨병환자혈청당화저밀도지단백수평,위당뇨병병발관심병적예방제공이론의거。방법선취아원수치적110례당뇨병환자작위관찰조,선취동시기진행건강체검적건강자110례작위대조조,검측량조환자혈청중적혈당、삼선감유、재지단백、담고순、당화저밀도지단백、당화혈홍단백등。결과관찰조환자적G-LDL수평명현고우대조조(P<0.05﹚；단량조apoB100、LDL-C수평대비무통계학차이(P>0.05﹚；apoA-I여HDL-C적수평명현저우대조조(P<0.05﹚；Clu、TG이급Chol수평명현고우대조조(P<0.05﹚。관찰조적G-LDL수평여Glu정정상관(r=0.631,P<0.05﹚,여LDL-C、HbA1c수평무상관관계(r=0.328、0.329,P>0.05﹚。결론당뇨병환자적혈청당화저밀도지단백수평현저제승,차여혈당치정정상관관계。대평고당뇨병적치료료효유중요적림상개치。
Objective To explore the serum glycated LDL levels in patients with diabetes, to provide a theoretical basis for the prevention of coronary heart disease complicated by diabetes. Methods A total of 110 cases admitted to our hospital with diabetes were selected as the observation group, chose the same period health examination of 110 cases of healthy people as control group, serum glycated LDL(G-LDL), glucose(Glu), triglyceride (TG), apolipoprotein, cholesterol (Chol), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were detected in two groups. Re-sults The observation group of patients with G-LDL levels were significantly higher than the control group(P<0.05), but apoB100 and LDL-C levels had no significant difference between two groups (P>0.05); apoA-I and HDL-C levels of obersvation group were significantly lower than the control group (P<0.05), while Glu, TG and Chol levels were signifi-cantly higher than control group (P<0.05). G-LDL levels of observation group were positively correlated with Glu (r=0.631, P<0.05), and were no correlation with LDL-C levels and HbA1c (r=0.328, 0.329, P>0.05). Conclusion G-LDL levels in diabetics are significantly improved in diabetics, and are positively correlated with Glu, have an important role in diabetes diagnosis and evaluation of biochemical indicators.
