中国现代医生
中國現代醫生
중국현대의생
CHINA MODERN DOCTOR
2015年
2期
33-35
,共3页
颅内动脉瘤破裂%急性期%非急性期%手术
顱內動脈瘤破裂%急性期%非急性期%手術
로내동맥류파렬%급성기%비급성기%수술
Intracranial aneurysm rupture%Acute phase%Non-acute phase%Surgery
目的:比较急性期及非急性期手术治疗颅内动脉瘤破裂的临床效果。方法共收集2012年5月~2014年7月来我院就诊的颅内动脉瘤破裂患者176例,将患者按照治疗的不同时间分为两组,急性期手术组91例,手术治疗时间为发病后0~3 d内,非急性期手术组85例,手术治疗时间为发病3 d后。两组患者均行动脉瘤夹闭术。比较两组术前再出血率、术中完全夹闭率、术后常见并发症情况、预后情况。结果(1)急性期手术组患者的术前再出血率(1.10%)与非急性期手术组(9.41%)比较明显较低,术中完全夹闭率(92.31%)与非急性期手术组(81.18%)比较明显较高,差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.05)。(2)急性期手术组术后脑梗死发生率(13.19%)、术后脑积水发生率(8.79%)较非急性期手术组(5.88%、4.71%)高,但差异不具有统计学意义(P﹥0.05)。(3)急性期手术组预后良好率(73.63%)与非急性期手术组(69.41%)比较较高,但差异不具有统计学意义(P﹥0.05)。结论急性期手术治疗颅内动脉瘤破裂患者可明显降低术前再出血率,提高术中完全夹闭率,明显降低患者由于再出血导致的死亡致残率,有利于疾病早期康复。
目的:比較急性期及非急性期手術治療顱內動脈瘤破裂的臨床效果。方法共收集2012年5月~2014年7月來我院就診的顱內動脈瘤破裂患者176例,將患者按照治療的不同時間分為兩組,急性期手術組91例,手術治療時間為髮病後0~3 d內,非急性期手術組85例,手術治療時間為髮病3 d後。兩組患者均行動脈瘤夾閉術。比較兩組術前再齣血率、術中完全夾閉率、術後常見併髮癥情況、預後情況。結果(1)急性期手術組患者的術前再齣血率(1.10%)與非急性期手術組(9.41%)比較明顯較低,術中完全夾閉率(92.31%)與非急性期手術組(81.18%)比較明顯較高,差異有統計學意義(P﹤0.05)。(2)急性期手術組術後腦梗死髮生率(13.19%)、術後腦積水髮生率(8.79%)較非急性期手術組(5.88%、4.71%)高,但差異不具有統計學意義(P﹥0.05)。(3)急性期手術組預後良好率(73.63%)與非急性期手術組(69.41%)比較較高,但差異不具有統計學意義(P﹥0.05)。結論急性期手術治療顱內動脈瘤破裂患者可明顯降低術前再齣血率,提高術中完全夾閉率,明顯降低患者由于再齣血導緻的死亡緻殘率,有利于疾病早期康複。
목적:비교급성기급비급성기수술치료로내동맥류파렬적림상효과。방법공수집2012년5월~2014년7월래아원취진적로내동맥류파렬환자176례,장환자안조치료적불동시간분위량조,급성기수술조91례,수술치료시간위발병후0~3 d내,비급성기수술조85례,수술치료시간위발병3 d후。량조환자균행동맥류협폐술。비교량조술전재출혈솔、술중완전협폐솔、술후상견병발증정황、예후정황。결과(1)급성기수술조환자적술전재출혈솔(1.10%)여비급성기수술조(9.41%)비교명현교저,술중완전협폐솔(92.31%)여비급성기수술조(81.18%)비교명현교고,차이유통계학의의(P﹤0.05)。(2)급성기수술조술후뇌경사발생솔(13.19%)、술후뇌적수발생솔(8.79%)교비급성기수술조(5.88%、4.71%)고,단차이불구유통계학의의(P﹥0.05)。(3)급성기수술조예후량호솔(73.63%)여비급성기수술조(69.41%)비교교고,단차이불구유통계학의의(P﹥0.05)。결론급성기수술치료로내동맥류파렬환자가명현강저술전재출혈솔,제고술중완전협폐솔,명현강저환자유우재출혈도치적사망치잔솔,유리우질병조기강복。
Objective To compare the clinical effect of intracranial aneurysms rupture with the acute and non-acute stage surgical. Methods All 176 cases with ruptured intracranial aneurysms were collected from May 2012 to July 2014 in our hospital, the patients were divided into two groups according to different treatment time, the acute surgery group included 91 cases, surgical treatment time of patients in this group was 0 to 3 days after the onset, the non-acute surgery group included 85 cases, the surgery time of this group was three days after onset. Two groups of patients were given underwent aneurysm surgery. Re-bleeding rates preoperative, intraoperative complete occlusion rate, postopera-tive complications, prognosis of two group were compared. Results (1)The intraoperative re-bleeding rate of the acute surgery group (1.10%) was significantly lower than the non-acute surgery group (9.41%), the intraoperative complete occlusion rate (92.31%) was significantly higher than non-acute surgery group (81.18%), there were significant differ-ence between two groups (P<0.05). (2)The incidence of infarction postoperative of the acute surgery group (13.19%), the incidence of postoperative hydrocephalus (8.79%) were higher than non-acute surgery group (5.88%, 4.71%), but there were no significant difference between two groups (P>0.05).(3)The good prognosis rate of acute surgery group (73.63%) was higher than the non-acute surgery group (69.41%), but there were no significant difference between two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Acute surgical treatment in patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms can significantly reduce the rate of re-bleeding before surgery to improve intraoperative complete occlusion rate, patients' morbidity and mortality caused by bleeding are significantly reduced in favor of early rehabilitation of patients.