吉林大学学报(地球科学版)
吉林大學學報(地毬科學版)
길림대학학보(지구과학판)
JOURNAL OF JILIN UNIVERSITY(EARTH SCIENCE EDITION)
2015年
1期
132-141
,共10页
冯晓曦%姚书振%段明%曲凯%王佳营%冯旭彪%李超%周利敏
馮曉晞%姚書振%段明%麯凱%王佳營%馮旭彪%李超%週利敏
풍효희%요서진%단명%곡개%왕가영%풍욱표%리초%주리민
Re Os 同位素年龄%辉钼矿%成矿时代%成矿背景%内蒙古%白乃庙铜(钼)矿
Re Os 同位素年齡%輝鉬礦%成礦時代%成礦揹景%內矇古%白迺廟銅(鉬)礦
Re Os 동위소년령%휘목광%성광시대%성광배경%내몽고%백내묘동(목)광
Re Os age%molybdenite%metallogenic age%metallogenic setting%Inner Mongolia%Bainaimiao Cu(Mo)deposit
内蒙古白乃庙铜(钼)矿床是华北板块北缘中段最重要的一个铜(钼)矿床,矿床由南、北两矿带构成。南矿带矿体主要产于寒武系白乃庙组绿片岩中,矿体产状与围岩基本一致;北矿带矿体大部分产于花岗闪长岩体中,部分延进围岩。利用 Re Os 同位素定年方法对南、北矿带主要矿段的5件辉钼矿样品进行了成矿时代研究,结果表明,辉钼矿样品的 Re Os 同位素模式年龄为(435.8±6.0)~(443.0±6.1) Ma,Re Os 同位素等时线年龄为(440.5±4.4)Ma(2σ,MSWD=1.4),属于早志留世,与花岗闪长斑岩成岩时代(440.0 Ma)一致。结合区域地质背景和矿床特征,认为白乃庙铜(钼)矿主成矿期为早志留世,与早志留世花岗闪长斑岩(440.0 Ma)岩浆侵入关系密切,又与早古生代古亚洲洋向华北板块强烈俯冲期(446.0~453.0 Ma)相吻合,但晚于围岩白乃庙组。综合分析认为该成矿事件是早古生代华北板块北缘“沟、弧、盆”体系演化和陆缘增生的产物。
內矇古白迺廟銅(鉬)礦床是華北闆塊北緣中段最重要的一箇銅(鉬)礦床,礦床由南、北兩礦帶構成。南礦帶礦體主要產于寒武繫白迺廟組綠片巖中,礦體產狀與圍巖基本一緻;北礦帶礦體大部分產于花崗閃長巖體中,部分延進圍巖。利用 Re Os 同位素定年方法對南、北礦帶主要礦段的5件輝鉬礦樣品進行瞭成礦時代研究,結果錶明,輝鉬礦樣品的 Re Os 同位素模式年齡為(435.8±6.0)~(443.0±6.1) Ma,Re Os 同位素等時線年齡為(440.5±4.4)Ma(2σ,MSWD=1.4),屬于早誌留世,與花崗閃長斑巖成巖時代(440.0 Ma)一緻。結閤區域地質揹景和礦床特徵,認為白迺廟銅(鉬)礦主成礦期為早誌留世,與早誌留世花崗閃長斑巖(440.0 Ma)巖漿侵入關繫密切,又與早古生代古亞洲洋嚮華北闆塊彊烈俯遲期(446.0~453.0 Ma)相吻閤,但晚于圍巖白迺廟組。綜閤分析認為該成礦事件是早古生代華北闆塊北緣“溝、弧、盆”體繫縯化和陸緣增生的產物。
내몽고백내묘동(목)광상시화북판괴북연중단최중요적일개동(목)광상,광상유남、북량광대구성。남광대광체주요산우한무계백내묘조록편암중,광체산상여위암기본일치;북광대광체대부분산우화강섬장암체중,부분연진위암。이용 Re Os 동위소정년방법대남、북광대주요광단적5건휘목광양품진행료성광시대연구,결과표명,휘목광양품적 Re Os 동위소모식년령위(435.8±6.0)~(443.0±6.1) Ma,Re Os 동위소등시선년령위(440.5±4.4)Ma(2σ,MSWD=1.4),속우조지류세,여화강섬장반암성암시대(440.0 Ma)일치。결합구역지질배경화광상특정,인위백내묘동(목)광주성광기위조지류세,여조지류세화강섬장반암(440.0 Ma)암장침입관계밀절,우여조고생대고아주양향화북판괴강렬부충기(446.0~453.0 Ma)상문합,단만우위암백내묘조。종합분석인위해성광사건시조고생대화북판괴북연“구、호、분”체계연화화륙연증생적산물。
The Bainaimiao Cu(Mo)deposit is the most important ones in the north margin of North China plate.It is composed of south belt and north belt.In south belt,ore bodies are concordant with ore-hosting green schist of the Cambrain Bainaimiao Formation,with near-bedded and lenticular shapes, the major bodies in north belt are located in granodiorite intrusion and partly extending into host rocks. The metallogenic age of this deposit has been disputed for many years.To dtermine the minerlization age,Re Os isotopic dating of five molybdenite samples,separated from both south and north ore belt, are completed,five molybdenite samples yield isotopic model ages of (435.8±6.0)Ma to (443.0±6.1) Ma,and an isochron age of (440.5±4.4)Ma (2σ,MSWD=1.4).These ages are well concordant with the emplacement age (440.0 Ma)of the granodiorite.Combining with regional geological background and deposit characteristics,authors think synthetically that the deposit formed in Early Silurian and has close relationship with granodioritic (440.0 Ma ) magmatic activities in Early Silurian. The mineralization age is also consist with the period (446.0 453.0 Ma)of the intensive southward subduction of the paleo-Asian oceanic plate beneath to the northern margin of the North China plate.By synthetical analysis,authors conclude that the major metallogenetic event were resulted from the evolution of the trech-basin-arc system and continent margin accretion in the North China plate during the Early Paleozoic epoch.