中国社区医师
中國社區醫師
중국사구의사
Chinese Community Doctors
2015年
3期
83-84
,共2页
开颅手术%保留骨桥%不保留骨桥%疗效观察
開顱手術%保留骨橋%不保留骨橋%療效觀察
개로수술%보류골교%불보류골교%료효관찰
Craniotomy operation%Reserved bone bridge%Don't keep the bone bridge%The curative effect observation
目的：观察开颅手术中保留骨桥与不保留骨桥的临床效果。方法：2012年6月-2014年1月收治颅内血肿患者50例，随机分为试验组和对照组，各25例，两组病例均接受手术治疗，试验组病例保留骨桥，对照组病例不保留骨桥，对比疗效。结果：对照组手术时间(76.2±11.4)min，短于试验组(106.3±20.3)min，比较两组颅内血肿病例的疗效及远期预后，差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。结论：开颅手术保留骨桥与不保留骨桥效果相当，均具有临床应用价值。
目的：觀察開顱手術中保留骨橋與不保留骨橋的臨床效果。方法：2012年6月-2014年1月收治顱內血腫患者50例，隨機分為試驗組和對照組，各25例，兩組病例均接受手術治療，試驗組病例保留骨橋，對照組病例不保留骨橋，對比療效。結果：對照組手術時間(76.2±11.4)min，短于試驗組(106.3±20.3)min，比較兩組顱內血腫病例的療效及遠期預後，差異無統計學意義(P＞0.05)。結論：開顱手術保留骨橋與不保留骨橋效果相噹，均具有臨床應用價值。
목적：관찰개로수술중보류골교여불보류골교적림상효과。방법：2012년6월-2014년1월수치로내혈종환자50례，수궤분위시험조화대조조，각25례，량조병례균접수수술치료，시험조병례보류골교，대조조병례불보류골교，대비료효。결과：대조조수술시간(76.2±11.4)min，단우시험조(106.3±20.3)min，비교량조로내혈종병례적료효급원기예후，차이무통계학의의(P＞0.05)。결론：개로수술보류골교여불보류골교효과상당，균구유림상응용개치。
Objective:To explore the curative effect of craniotomy operation with or without bone bridge.Methods:50 patients with intracranial hematoma were selected from June 2012 to January 2014.They were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group with 25 cases in each group.Two groups were given the operation treatment.The experimental group retained bone bridge.The control group did not preserve bone bridge.We compared the efficacy.Results:Operation time in the control group was (76.2±11.4) min,which was short than (106.3±20.3) min in the experimental group.Compared the prognosis and long-term therapeutic effects of the two groups,there was no significant difference(P>0.05).Conclusion:The curative effect of craniotomy operation with or without bone bridge is same,and all have the value of clinical application.
