北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版)
北京航空航天大學學報(社會科學版)
북경항공항천대학학보(사회과학판)
JOURNAL OF BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION)
2015年
1期
63-69
,共7页
马航MH17航班%管辖权%国际刑事法院%战争罪%国际法
馬航MH17航班%管轄權%國際刑事法院%戰爭罪%國際法
마항MH17항반%관할권%국제형사법원%전쟁죄%국제법
Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17%jurisdiction%International Criminal Court%war crime%International Law
2014年7月17日,马来西亚航空公司的一架客机在飞越乌克兰东部交战区域时被导弹击中坠毁,机组人员与乘客全部遇难。基于相关事实,认为根据现有国际条约,故意击落他国民航客机属于严重危害民用航空安全的犯罪行为,且违反了1949年《关于战时保护平民之日内瓦公约》的规定,构成了《国际刑事法院规约》中的“战争罪”。限于种种因素,国际刑事法院和国际法院很难对涉事的国家和个人实施管辖,但犯罪发生地国、航空器登记地国、罪犯藏匿地国乃至受害者国籍国等都可依普遍管辖权或其国内法的规定对本案实施管辖并对罪犯定罪量刑。
2014年7月17日,馬來西亞航空公司的一架客機在飛越烏剋蘭東部交戰區域時被導彈擊中墜燬,機組人員與乘客全部遇難。基于相關事實,認為根據現有國際條約,故意擊落他國民航客機屬于嚴重危害民用航空安全的犯罪行為,且違反瞭1949年《關于戰時保護平民之日內瓦公約》的規定,構成瞭《國際刑事法院規約》中的“戰爭罪”。限于種種因素,國際刑事法院和國際法院很難對涉事的國傢和箇人實施管轄,但犯罪髮生地國、航空器登記地國、罪犯藏匿地國迺至受害者國籍國等都可依普遍管轄權或其國內法的規定對本案實施管轄併對罪犯定罪量刑。
2014년7월17일,마래서아항공공사적일가객궤재비월오극란동부교전구역시피도탄격중추훼,궤조인원여승객전부우난。기우상관사실,인위근거현유국제조약,고의격락타국민항객궤속우엄중위해민용항공안전적범죄행위,차위반료1949년《관우전시보호평민지일내와공약》적규정,구성료《국제형사법원규약》중적“전쟁죄”。한우충충인소,국제형사법원화국제법원흔난대섭사적국가화개인실시관할,단범죄발생지국、항공기등기지국、죄범장닉지국내지수해자국적국등도가의보편관할권혹기국내법적규정대본안실시관할병대죄범정죄양형。
On July 17, 2014, Malaysia Airlines (MH17) was shot down by a missile in eastern Ukraine where fierce fighting were going on between Ukrainian forces and insurgents , killing all passengers and crew aboard .Based on rel-evant facts , this article holds that intentional shooting down of the civilian airliner of other countries is a criminal of -fence that seriously endangers the safety of civil aviation .It violates the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in 1949 and constitutes war crime under the Rome Statute of International Criminal Court.Due to many restrictions , it is difficult for the International Criminal Court or the International Court of Justice to employ ju -risdiction over the states or persons involved in this tragedy .However, the state where the crime occurred , the state where the aircraft registered , the state where the criminals hide or the state to which the victims'nationality belongs have jurisdiction based on their domestic laws or according to the universal jurisdiction principle .