心理与行为研究
心理與行為研究
심리여행위연구
STUDIES OF PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR
2014年
4期
447-453
,共7页
聋人%语篇理解%连接推理%眼动
聾人%語篇理解%連接推理%眼動
롱인%어편리해%련접추리%안동
deaf reader%eye-tracking%eye-movements%bridging inference%discourse comprehension
采用记录被试阅读完成后回答问题的正确率、反应时与眼动指标,试图探讨不同阅读能力聋人语篇理解中连接推理的加工特点与效率。结果表明:在语篇局部连贯中断情况下,高低阅读能力聋人在语篇理解过程中的连接推理加工是主动的即时性加工,而非语篇阅读完成后被动的延时性加工;但高阅读能力聋人能有效激活背景知识,所发生的连接推理加工是一个自动化的加工;低阅读能力聋人主动尝试即时激活背景知识、构建句子间的连接推理,但连接推理的加工还未达到自动化程度,推理加工的效率较低。
採用記錄被試閱讀完成後迴答問題的正確率、反應時與眼動指標,試圖探討不同閱讀能力聾人語篇理解中連接推理的加工特點與效率。結果錶明:在語篇跼部連貫中斷情況下,高低閱讀能力聾人在語篇理解過程中的連接推理加工是主動的即時性加工,而非語篇閱讀完成後被動的延時性加工;但高閱讀能力聾人能有效激活揹景知識,所髮生的連接推理加工是一箇自動化的加工;低閱讀能力聾人主動嘗試即時激活揹景知識、構建句子間的連接推理,但連接推理的加工還未達到自動化程度,推理加工的效率較低。
채용기록피시열독완성후회답문제적정학솔、반응시여안동지표,시도탐토불동열독능력롱인어편리해중련접추리적가공특점여효솔。결과표명:재어편국부련관중단정황하,고저열독능력롱인재어편리해과정중적련접추리가공시주동적즉시성가공,이비어편열독완성후피동적연시성가공;단고열독능력롱인능유효격활배경지식,소발생적련접추리가공시일개자동화적가공;저열독능력롱인주동상시즉시격활배경지식、구건구자간적련접추리,단련접추리적가공환미체도자동화정도,추리가공적효솔교저。
In this study, two questions regarding deaf adolescents with skilled and less skilled processing of bridging in-ference are investigated.12 deaf readers with skilled and 10 deaf readers with less skilled read short, two-sentence passages that was either a causal sequence or a control temporal sequence, and respond to two questions,one is posited to refer to the relevant knowledge used to evaluate the mediating fact and the other is about explicit informa -tion of the discourse.We measured correct responses and answer times to questions , as well as recorded the eye-movements of the participants while reading .Analysis of the skilled participants ’answer times to questions were consistently faster in the causal condition than the control condition , indicating skilled adolescents with deaf con-struct bridging inference online.We can’ t find the validation effect in less skilled adolescents with deaf, indicating they don’ t construct bridging inference online.However, the eye-movements data revealed that the less skilled readers with deaf spent more time fixating, made more fixations, and made total times in the causal sentences while reading than did skilled readers with deaf .One explanation is that they make the inferences, but are unable to re-tain them offline or they make the inferences but are unable to incorporate them into meaning formed from text and prior knowledge activated during the reading process.The study also suggests that skilled deaf readers draw bridg-ing inference automatically and efficiently, less skilled deaf reader are less efficient and are not up to the degree of automation at drawing bridging inference.Implication of these finding and suggestions for future research are of-fered.