CAJ | 학술논문

“物”是《老子》书中的一个高频词，但其丰富的含义及重要性还未得到充分揭示。对比研究郭店楚简本《老子》和王弼本《老子》可以发现，“物”，在“楚简本”中基本指“一切自然存在者”，其含义比较单一、明确；而在“王弼本”中，其含义则比较复杂，“物”或意指“道”。由此可以推断王弼本对郭店楚简本《老子》之文义存在继承与发展。另外，只有建立在“道”、“物”、“器”三个层次相区分的基础上，《老子》中的“有”、“无”之含义才能更明晰。
“물”시《노자》서중적일개고빈사，단기봉부적함의급중요성환미득도충분게시。대비연구곽점초간본《노자》화왕필본《노자》가이발현，“물”，재“초간본”중기본지“일절자연존재자”，기함의비교단일、명학；이재“왕필본”중，기함의칙비교복잡，“물”혹의지“도”。유차가이추단왕필본대곽점초간본《노자》지문의존재계승여발전。령외，지유건립재“도”、“물”、“기”삼개층차상구분적기출상，《노자》중적“유”、“무”지함의재능경명석。
Thing is a high-frequency word in Laozi , but its meaning has not been fully explained .A comparative study of the Chu bam-boo slip version of Guodian and Wang Bi's version can reveal that the term “thing” refers to any natural thing , with a single and clear meaning , and that in Wang's version it refers to Tao with a complicated meaning .So it can be judged that Wang's version inherits and de-velops the meaning of the term “thing”.Based on the differentiation of Tao , thing, and device, the meaning of “having” and“nothing”can be understood more clearly .