创伤外科杂志
創傷外科雜誌
창상외과잡지
JOURNAL OF AUMATIC SURGERY
2015年
1期
28-32
,共5页
闫文龙%杨小中%张华%张健
閆文龍%楊小中%張華%張健
염문룡%양소중%장화%장건
转子间骨折%生物固定假体%骨水泥%并发症%高龄
轉子間骨摺%生物固定假體%骨水泥%併髮癥%高齡
전자간골절%생물고정가체%골수니%병발증%고령
intertrochanteric fracture%cementless prosthesis%cement%complication%senile
目的:比较远端固定生物型股骨假体与骨水泥型股骨假体行人工髋关节置换治疗高龄股骨转子间骨折的早期临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2010年8月~2012年4月在我院骨科行人工髋关节置换治疗的59例单侧股骨转子间骨折高龄患者的临床资料,实际随访54例。随机分成两组:生物固定组21例,骨水泥组33例。比较两组住院时间、手术时间、术中出血量、术后3d总失血量、术后并发症、Harris评分以及放射学效果。结果生物固定组手术时间、术中出血均明显少于骨水泥组;生物固定组术中、术后出现假体周围骨折各1例;两组住院时间、术后3d总失血量、Harris评分、术后并发症发生率相比,差异无统计学意义( P>0.05)。结论生物固定组可减少术中出血、缩短手术时间并减少或消除“骨水泥植入综合征”,但术后3d总失血量无明显减少,出现假体周围骨折风险增高,术前需严格把握手术适应证。
目的:比較遠耑固定生物型股骨假體與骨水泥型股骨假體行人工髖關節置換治療高齡股骨轉子間骨摺的早期臨床療效。方法迴顧性分析2010年8月~2012年4月在我院骨科行人工髖關節置換治療的59例單側股骨轉子間骨摺高齡患者的臨床資料,實際隨訪54例。隨機分成兩組:生物固定組21例,骨水泥組33例。比較兩組住院時間、手術時間、術中齣血量、術後3d總失血量、術後併髮癥、Harris評分以及放射學效果。結果生物固定組手術時間、術中齣血均明顯少于骨水泥組;生物固定組術中、術後齣現假體週圍骨摺各1例;兩組住院時間、術後3d總失血量、Harris評分、術後併髮癥髮生率相比,差異無統計學意義( P>0.05)。結論生物固定組可減少術中齣血、縮短手術時間併減少或消除“骨水泥植入綜閤徵”,但術後3d總失血量無明顯減少,齣現假體週圍骨摺風險增高,術前需嚴格把握手術適應證。
목적:비교원단고정생물형고골가체여골수니형고골가체행인공관관절치환치료고령고골전자간골절적조기림상료효。방법회고성분석2010년8월~2012년4월재아원골과행인공관관절치환치료적59례단측고골전자간골절고령환자적림상자료,실제수방54례。수궤분성량조:생물고정조21례,골수니조33례。비교량조주원시간、수술시간、술중출혈량、술후3d총실혈량、술후병발증、Harris평분이급방사학효과。결과생물고정조수술시간、술중출혈균명현소우골수니조;생물고정조술중、술후출현가체주위골절각1례;량조주원시간、술후3d총실혈량、Harris평분、술후병발증발생솔상비,차이무통계학의의( P>0.05)。결론생물고정조가감소술중출혈、축단수술시간병감소혹소제“골수니식입종합정”,단술후3d총실혈량무명현감소,출현가체주위골절풍험증고,술전수엄격파악수술괄응증。
Objective To compare the short-term clinical effect of the distal fixed prosthesis ( cementless prosthesis ) with cemented femoral stem prosthesis in hip arthroplasty for elderly intertrochanteric fracture .Methods Fifty-nine cases(54 cases followed-up) of unilateral intertrochanteric fracture in senile patients from Aug .2010 to Apr.2012 were retrospectively analyzed and randomly divided into 2 groups.In them,21 cases underwent hip ar-throplasty using the distal fixed prosthesis ( cementless group ) ,and the other 33 were treated with cemented hip ar-throplasty (cement group).The difference was compared in time of hospitalization , time of operation,blood loss, adverse effect,Harris scoring and radiological results .Results The average operation time were (42.3 ±7.2) mi-nutes in cementless group and (51.5 ±8.3) minutes in cement group,with significant difference (P<0.05).The blood loss were (149.9 ±27.7) ml in cementless group and(205.2 ±47.3)ml in cement group,with significant differ-ence(P<0.05).Two patients developed periprosthetic femoral fracture in cementless group .There was no signifi-cant statistical difference between two groups in time of hospitalization , total blood loss 3 days after the operation ,Har-ris scoring,complications and radiographic evaluations (including radiolucent line,osteolysis) (P>0.05).Conclu-sion Hip arthroplasty using cementless prosthesis for treatment of elder patients with intertrochanteric fracture can a -chieve good short-term clinical effect alike cemented prosthesis .It helps reduce operative time ,blood loss and bone cement implantation syndrome during the operation .The medium and long term effect still needs further research . And preoperative evaluation on the shape and size of medullary cavity and the severity of osteoporosis is needed .