创伤外科杂志
創傷外科雜誌
창상외과잡지
JOURNAL OF AUMATIC SURGERY
2015年
1期
13-16
,共4页
罗伟东%黄枫%郑晓辉%周琦石%陈朝
囉偉東%黃楓%鄭曉輝%週琦石%陳朝
라위동%황풍%정효휘%주기석%진조
四肢%植皮%负压引流%敷料%疗效
四肢%植皮%負壓引流%敷料%療效
사지%식피%부압인류%부료%료효
limbs%skin grafting%vacuum drainage%dressing%efficacy
目的:比较两种不同伤口负压敷料在四肢植皮术中的疗效。方法回顾分析对2011年1月~2014年2月四肢创面行植皮治疗的70例患者,32例应用外置吸盘封闭式负压敷料固定皮片( A组),38例应用内置吸管封闭式负压引流敷料(B组)。两组患者均于术后7d摘除敷料,对两组病人首次植皮成活率情况、平均手术时间、创面完全愈合时间、平均住院时间进行统计学分析,采用t检验和卡方检验,对此两种方法进行评价。结果两组患者均有效达到创面植皮覆盖效果,无感染及不愈合情况出现。 A组与B组在首次植皮成活率、手术时间上对比有显著统计学差异性(P<0.05),在创面完全愈合时间及平均住院时间方面两者无明显统计学差异( P>0.05)。结论外置吸盘封闭式负压敷料与内置吸管封闭式负压引流敷料均可用于植皮,外置吸盘封闭式负压敷料在首次植皮成活率及手术时间上优于内置吸管封闭式负压引流敷料,我们可以根据病人的不同情况选择这两种方法。
目的:比較兩種不同傷口負壓敷料在四肢植皮術中的療效。方法迴顧分析對2011年1月~2014年2月四肢創麵行植皮治療的70例患者,32例應用外置吸盤封閉式負壓敷料固定皮片( A組),38例應用內置吸管封閉式負壓引流敷料(B組)。兩組患者均于術後7d摘除敷料,對兩組病人首次植皮成活率情況、平均手術時間、創麵完全愈閤時間、平均住院時間進行統計學分析,採用t檢驗和卡方檢驗,對此兩種方法進行評價。結果兩組患者均有效達到創麵植皮覆蓋效果,無感染及不愈閤情況齣現。 A組與B組在首次植皮成活率、手術時間上對比有顯著統計學差異性(P<0.05),在創麵完全愈閤時間及平均住院時間方麵兩者無明顯統計學差異( P>0.05)。結論外置吸盤封閉式負壓敷料與內置吸管封閉式負壓引流敷料均可用于植皮,外置吸盤封閉式負壓敷料在首次植皮成活率及手術時間上優于內置吸管封閉式負壓引流敷料,我們可以根據病人的不同情況選擇這兩種方法。
목적:비교량충불동상구부압부료재사지식피술중적료효。방법회고분석대2011년1월~2014년2월사지창면행식피치료적70례환자,32례응용외치흡반봉폐식부압부료고정피편( A조),38례응용내치흡관봉폐식부압인류부료(B조)。량조환자균우술후7d적제부료,대량조병인수차식피성활솔정황、평균수술시간、창면완전유합시간、평균주원시간진행통계학분석,채용t검험화잡방검험,대차량충방법진행평개。결과량조환자균유효체도창면식피복개효과,무감염급불유합정황출현。 A조여B조재수차식피성활솔、수술시간상대비유현저통계학차이성(P<0.05),재창면완전유합시간급평균주원시간방면량자무명현통계학차이( P>0.05)。결론외치흡반봉폐식부압부료여내치흡관봉폐식부압인류부료균가용우식피,외치흡반봉폐식부압부료재수차식피성활솔급수술시간상우우내치흡관봉폐식부압인류부료,아문가이근거병인적불동정황선택저량충방법。
Objective To observe the effect of two different kinds of dressing for vacuum drainage in limb skin grafting.Methods In this study,70 patients with skin and soft tissue defect were treated with skin grafting from Jan.2011 to Feb.2014.Among them,32 patients were treated with negative pressure drainage dressing (Group A) and the other 38 patients were treated with vacuum sealing drainage (Group B).The dressings were removed after 1 week of treatment .The survival rate of skin graft ,operation time ,wound healing time and the average hospi-talization time were recorded and analyzed and the therapeutic effects were compared by T test and χ2 test.Results The survival rate of skin graft in Group A was significantly higher than that of Group B (P<0.05),and the opera-tion time in Group A was significantly shorter than that of Group B (P<0.05) while the wound healing time and the time in hospital had no statistical differences (P>0.05).Conclusion Both kinds of dressing have good effect on the coverage of skin grafting .Compared with vacuum sealing drainage dressing ,negative pressure drainage dressing has the advantage of improving the survival rate of thin skin graft and reducing the operation time .We can choose the dressing based on the condition of the patient .