临床合理用药杂志
臨床閤理用藥雜誌
림상합리용약잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RATIONAL DRUG USE
2015年
1期
13-14
,共2页
王莉华%刘东芹%张玉玺%胡凯%刘志强%赵永高
王莉華%劉東芹%張玉璽%鬍凱%劉誌彊%趙永高
왕리화%류동근%장옥새%호개%류지강%조영고
血液吸附%血液透析滤过%血液透析%左心舒张功能%微炎性反应,超敏C反应蛋白
血液吸附%血液透析濾過%血液透析%左心舒張功能%微炎性反應,超敏C反應蛋白
혈액흡부%혈액투석려과%혈액투석%좌심서장공능%미염성반응,초민C반응단백
Blood adsorption%Hemodiafiltration%Hemodialysis%Left ventricular diastolic function%Microinflammation
目的:探讨血液吸附、血液透析滤过及血液透析3种血液净化方式对透析患者左心舒张功能及微炎性反应(超敏C反应蛋白)的影响。方法将需接受血液净化治疗的患者309例随机分为A、B、C 3组各103例。给予所有患者常规对症治疗、营养支持和特级护理,A组患者采取血液吸附净化血液,B组采取血液透析滤过净化血液, C组仅采取血液透析净化血液,血液净化治疗1个月后比较3组患者左心舒张功能及微炎性反应差异。结果治疗后A、B组左心舒张功能及微炎性反应程度相近,差异均无统计学意义( P>0.05);C组患者左心舒张功能不全及微炎性反应程度均较A、B组严重,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论血液吸附和血液透析滤过对透析患者左心舒张功能及微炎性反应影响较血液透析低。
目的:探討血液吸附、血液透析濾過及血液透析3種血液淨化方式對透析患者左心舒張功能及微炎性反應(超敏C反應蛋白)的影響。方法將需接受血液淨化治療的患者309例隨機分為A、B、C 3組各103例。給予所有患者常規對癥治療、營養支持和特級護理,A組患者採取血液吸附淨化血液,B組採取血液透析濾過淨化血液, C組僅採取血液透析淨化血液,血液淨化治療1箇月後比較3組患者左心舒張功能及微炎性反應差異。結果治療後A、B組左心舒張功能及微炎性反應程度相近,差異均無統計學意義( P>0.05);C組患者左心舒張功能不全及微炎性反應程度均較A、B組嚴重,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論血液吸附和血液透析濾過對透析患者左心舒張功能及微炎性反應影響較血液透析低。
목적:탐토혈액흡부、혈액투석려과급혈액투석3충혈액정화방식대투석환자좌심서장공능급미염성반응(초민C반응단백)적영향。방법장수접수혈액정화치료적환자309례수궤분위A、B、C 3조각103례。급여소유환자상규대증치료、영양지지화특급호리,A조환자채취혈액흡부정화혈액,B조채취혈액투석려과정화혈액, C조부채취혈액투석정화혈액,혈액정화치료1개월후비교3조환자좌심서장공능급미염성반응차이。결과치료후A、B조좌심서장공능급미염성반응정도상근,차이균무통계학의의( P>0.05);C조환자좌심서장공능불전급미염성반응정도균교A、B조엄중,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론혈액흡부화혈액투석려과대투석환자좌심서장공능급미염성반응영향교혈액투석저。
Objective To investigate the effect of adsorption of blood,hemodiafiltration and hemodialysis three kinds of blood purification for dialysis patients on left ventricular diastolic function and micro-inflammation( high-sensitivity C-reac-tive protein). Methods 309 patients,which need to receive blood purification therapy,were randomly divided into A,B,C 3 groups,each of 103 cases. All patients were given conventional symptomatic treatment,nutritional support and intensive care. A group took the blood adsorption to purify the blood,B group took hemodiafiltration purify the blood,C group only took dialysis to purify the blood. Compared the left ventricular diastolic function and microinflammation differences of three group after a month. Results After treatment,the left ventricular diastolic function and micro-inflammation extent of A group was similar to B group,the difference was not statistically significant(P>0. 05). The left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and micro-inflam-mation degree of C group were more serious than A group and B group,differences were statistically significant(P<0. 05). Conclusion Influence of hemoadsorption and hemodiafiltration on dialysis patients with left ventricular diastolic function and micro-inflammatory is lower than hemodialysis.