CAJ | 학술논문

媒体暴力观是在媒体暴力对儿童产生何种影响的争议中产生的。尼尔·波兹曼的《童年之死》一书中体现的是悲观主义媒体暴力观，大卫·帕金翰的《童年的消逝》一书中所体现的是理性主义媒体暴力观。本文通过对这两种不同的媒体暴力观的比较分析，获得让我们正确看待媒体暴力的启示：媒体暴力不是导致少年犯罪的唯一因素；管制责任的履行既在家长又在儿童；教育是减少媒体暴力负面影响的重要手段。
매체폭력관시재매체폭력대인동산생하충영향적쟁의중산생적。니이·파자만적《동년지사》일서중체현적시비관주의매체폭력관，대위·파금한적《동년적소서》일서중소체현적시이성주의매체폭력관。본문통과대저량충불동적매체폭력관적비교분석，획득양아문정학간대매체폭력적계시：매체폭력불시도치소년범죄적유일인소；관제책임적리행기재가장우재인동；교육시감소매체폭력부면영향적중요수단。
The perspective of media violence came into being in the disputes over impacts of media violence on children. Neil M. Postman held pessimistic perspective of media violence in his book “After the Death of Childhood”, while David Pakinghanm held rational perspective in his book” The Disappearance of Childhood” . This study focus on a comparative view of these perspectives, thus suggesting that media violence is not the only factors leading to juvenile delinquency for which parents and children both have to bear regulatory responsibility, and that education is considered as a point of penetration to reduce negative impacts form media violence.