CAJ | 학술논문

随着2014年量刑规范化的全面实施，量刑规范化改革方案所确立的量刑范式将成为我国刑事司法的常态性机制。总结和回顾量刑规范化改革历程可以发现，学界提出的量刑实体法与程序法改革并行的思路得到了决策层的认可，尤其是实体法改革方案的内容较大程度吸纳了刑法学界的智力成果；但在程序法改革方案的设计上，并没有采纳部分程序法学者主张的对抗化、独立式量刑程序架构，采取了在不突破我国刑事审判结构基础上设计的职权化、相对独立式的量刑程序架构。尽管面临学界的指责，但从客观效果看，改革的成效比较显著，理应受到肯定和坚持。当然，着眼于量刑规范化改革的进一步完善，未来可以在调整实体法方案的适用范围和构建多元化的量刑程序方面走得更远。
수착2014년양형규범화적전면실시，양형규범화개혁방안소학립적양형범식장성위아국형사사법적상태성궤제。총결화회고양형규범화개혁역정가이발현，학계제출적양형실체법여정서법개혁병행적사로득도료결책층적인가，우기시실체법개혁방안적내용교대정도흡납료형법학계적지력성과；단재정서법개혁방안적설계상，병몰유채납부분정서법학자주장적대항화、독입식양형정서가구，채취료재불돌파아국형사심판결구기출상설계적직권화、상대독입식적양형정서가구。진관면림학계적지책，단종객관효과간，개혁적성효비교현저，리응수도긍정화견지。당연，착안우양형규범화개혁적진일보완선，미래가이재조정실체법방안적괄용범위화구건다원화적양형정서방면주득경원。
With the full implementation of standardization of sentencing in 2014, sentencing norm set up by the reform scheme of standardization of sentencing will form the normal mechanism of China ’ s criminal justice. The review of the whole process of reform on standardization of sentencing reveals that the paralleling reform on substantial law and procedural law sponsored by scholars has been admitted by the decision level. That is especially true to the content of reform plan of substantial law which benefits a lot from the intellectual property of criminal law scholars. However, the reform plan for procedural law doesn’ t take scholars’ idea of confrontational and independent sentencing procedure structure. Instead, it adopts the authoritative and comparatively independent sentencing procedure structure without violating the structure of China’ s criminal trial. Despite the criticisms from scholars, the reform has gain distinc?tive objective progress so that it should be affirmed and insisted. Of course, from the further improvement of reform on standardization of measurement of penalty, more discussions are needed as to the adjusting of application of substantial law and the constructing of diverse sentencing procedure.