四川医学
四川醫學
사천의학
SICHUAN MEDICAL JOURNAL
2015年
1期
78-80
,共3页
高飞%刘清学%彭洪%刘建洪%李万华%凌思果%周栋
高飛%劉清學%彭洪%劉建洪%李萬華%凌思果%週棟
고비%류청학%팽홍%류건홍%리만화%릉사과%주동
肾盂-输尿管连接部梗阻(UPJO)%后腹腔镜%Anderson-Hyness成形术
腎盂-輸尿管連接部梗阻(UPJO)%後腹腔鏡%Anderson-Hyness成形術
신우-수뇨관련접부경조(UPJO)%후복강경%Anderson-Hyness성형술
ureteropelvic junction obstruction%retroperitoneal laparoscopic%anderson-Hyness plasty
目的:通过与开放Anderson-Hyness成形术的效果比较,评价后腹腔镜Anderson-Hyness成形术的临床价值。方法回顾性分析后腹腔镜Anderson-Hyness成形术9例( A组)及开放Anderson-Hyness成形术13例( B组)的临床资料,就两组手术时间、术中出血、术后肠道功能恢复时间、术后止痛药用量、术后住院天数、并发症、瘢痕满意度和成功率等指标进行比较。根据数据类型选用检验、成组t检验或Mann-WhiteyU检验。结果 A组在出血量、术后肠道功能恢复时间、术后止痛药用量、术后住院天数、并发症,瘢痕满意度等方面优于B组,差异有统计学意义( P<0.01﹚;成功率与B组差异无统计学意义( P>0.05﹚。结论后腹腔镜Anderson-Hyness成形术是一种治疗肾盂-输尿管连接部梗阻( UP-JO)的微创、安全、有效的方法,可以替代传统开放手术,成为首选术式。
目的:通過與開放Anderson-Hyness成形術的效果比較,評價後腹腔鏡Anderson-Hyness成形術的臨床價值。方法迴顧性分析後腹腔鏡Anderson-Hyness成形術9例( A組)及開放Anderson-Hyness成形術13例( B組)的臨床資料,就兩組手術時間、術中齣血、術後腸道功能恢複時間、術後止痛藥用量、術後住院天數、併髮癥、瘢痕滿意度和成功率等指標進行比較。根據數據類型選用檢驗、成組t檢驗或Mann-WhiteyU檢驗。結果 A組在齣血量、術後腸道功能恢複時間、術後止痛藥用量、術後住院天數、併髮癥,瘢痕滿意度等方麵優于B組,差異有統計學意義( P<0.01﹚;成功率與B組差異無統計學意義( P>0.05﹚。結論後腹腔鏡Anderson-Hyness成形術是一種治療腎盂-輸尿管連接部梗阻( UP-JO)的微創、安全、有效的方法,可以替代傳統開放手術,成為首選術式。
목적:통과여개방Anderson-Hyness성형술적효과비교,평개후복강경Anderson-Hyness성형술적림상개치。방법회고성분석후복강경Anderson-Hyness성형술9례( A조)급개방Anderson-Hyness성형술13례( B조)적림상자료,취량조수술시간、술중출혈、술후장도공능회복시간、술후지통약용량、술후주원천수、병발증、반흔만의도화성공솔등지표진행비교。근거수거류형선용검험、성조t검험혹Mann-WhiteyU검험。결과 A조재출혈량、술후장도공능회복시간、술후지통약용량、술후주원천수、병발증,반흔만의도등방면우우B조,차이유통계학의의( P<0.01﹚;성공솔여B조차이무통계학의의( P>0.05﹚。결론후복강경Anderson-Hyness성형술시일충치료신우-수뇨관련접부경조( UP-JO)적미창、안전、유효적방법,가이체대전통개방수술,성위수선술식。
Objective With the comparison of the effect of open Anderson-Hyness plasty,to evaluate the clinical value of retroperitoneal laparoscopic Anderson-Hyness plasty. Methods Regression analysis after laparoscopic Anderson-Hyness plasty in 9cases (group A) and open Anderson-Hyness plasty in 13 cases (group B) clinical data, on the operation time, bleeding in the two group, postoperative intestinal function recovery time, postoperative analgesic consumption, postoperative hospital stay, com-plications , scar satisfaction and success rate were compared between the. According to the type of the data using test, t test or Mann-WhiteyU test group. Result In group A, the amount of bleeding, postoperative intestinal function recovery time, postoper-ative analgesic consumption, postoperative hospital stay, complications, scar satisfaction is better than that of B group, the differ-ence was statistically significant (P<0. 01);success rate with B group, no significant difference (P>0. 05). Conclusion ret-roperitoneal laparoscopic Anderson-Hyness angioplasty is a treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction ( UPJO) and minimally invasive, safe, effective method, can replace the traditional open operation, become the preferred type of operation.