中国性科学
中國性科學
중국성과학
THE CHINESE JOURNAL OF HUMAN SEXUALITY
2015年
2期
27-29
,共3页
尿沉渣%干化学%泌尿生殖系统感染%应用评价
尿沉渣%榦化學%泌尿生殖繫統感染%應用評價
뇨침사%간화학%비뇨생식계통감염%응용평개
Urine sediments%Dry chemical%Urogenital infections%Application and evaluation
目的：对尿沉渣与干化学联合检测在泌尿生殖系统感染中的应用展开研究分析。方法：随机选取2012年4月至2014年4月期间我院接收疑为泌尿生殖系统感染患者的500份尿液标本，所有标本均进行尿细菌定量培养，并应用尿沉渣和干化学检测白细胞（WBC）、细菌（BACT）、白细胞酯酶（LEU）、亚硝酸盐（NIT），以尿培养结果为金标准，观察对比检测结果。结果：尿沉渣检测 WBC、BACT 与定量培养结果对比，无显著性差异，无统计学意义（P ＞0.05）；干化学检测 LEU、NIT 与定量培养结果对比，差异性显著，具有统计学意义（P ＜0.05）；尿沉渣和干化学联合检测结果与定量培养结果对比，无显著性差异，无统计学意义（P ＞0.05）；尿沉渣与干化学联合检测诊断尿路感染的灵敏度、特异性、总符合率以及阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为75.8％、94.7％、87.5％、91.2％、84.6％。结论：尿沉渣与干化学联合检测与尿定量培养结果对泌尿生殖系统感染有着高度统一性，对泌尿生殖系统感染早期筛选、诊断有着十分重要的临床价值。
目的：對尿沉渣與榦化學聯閤檢測在泌尿生殖繫統感染中的應用展開研究分析。方法：隨機選取2012年4月至2014年4月期間我院接收疑為泌尿生殖繫統感染患者的500份尿液標本，所有標本均進行尿細菌定量培養，併應用尿沉渣和榦化學檢測白細胞（WBC）、細菌（BACT）、白細胞酯酶（LEU）、亞硝痠鹽（NIT），以尿培養結果為金標準，觀察對比檢測結果。結果：尿沉渣檢測 WBC、BACT 與定量培養結果對比，無顯著性差異，無統計學意義（P ＞0.05）；榦化學檢測 LEU、NIT 與定量培養結果對比，差異性顯著，具有統計學意義（P ＜0.05）；尿沉渣和榦化學聯閤檢測結果與定量培養結果對比，無顯著性差異，無統計學意義（P ＞0.05）；尿沉渣與榦化學聯閤檢測診斷尿路感染的靈敏度、特異性、總符閤率以及暘性預測值、陰性預測值分彆為75.8％、94.7％、87.5％、91.2％、84.6％。結論：尿沉渣與榦化學聯閤檢測與尿定量培養結果對泌尿生殖繫統感染有著高度統一性，對泌尿生殖繫統感染早期篩選、診斷有著十分重要的臨床價值。
목적：대뇨침사여간화학연합검측재비뇨생식계통감염중적응용전개연구분석。방법：수궤선취2012년4월지2014년4월기간아원접수의위비뇨생식계통감염환자적500빈뇨액표본，소유표본균진행뇨세균정량배양，병응용뇨침사화간화학검측백세포（WBC）、세균（BACT）、백세포지매（LEU）、아초산염（NIT），이뇨배양결과위금표준，관찰대비검측결과。결과：뇨침사검측 WBC、BACT 여정량배양결과대비，무현저성차이，무통계학의의（P ＞0.05）；간화학검측 LEU、NIT 여정량배양결과대비，차이성현저，구유통계학의의（P ＜0.05）；뇨침사화간화학연합검측결과여정량배양결과대비，무현저성차이，무통계학의의（P ＞0.05）；뇨침사여간화학연합검측진단뇨로감염적령민도、특이성、총부합솔이급양성예측치、음성예측치분별위75.8％、94.7％、87.5％、91.2％、84.6％。결론：뇨침사여간화학연합검측여뇨정량배양결과대비뇨생식계통감염유착고도통일성，대비뇨생식계통감염조기사선、진단유착십분중요적림상개치。
Objectives:To explore the application and evaluation of urine sediments and dry chemical com-bined detection of urogenital system infections.Methods:500 urine samples in our hospital from April 2012 to A-pril 2014 were randomly selected.All samples were conducted quantitative bacterial cultures of urine and urinary sediment and dry chemical detection were applied to detect leukocytes (WBC),bacteria (BACT),leukocyte ester-ase (LEU),nitrite (NIT).Taking urine culture results as the gold standard,the results of detection were observed and compared.Results:No statistically significant difference could be found in the comparison of urine detection WBC and BACT (P >0.05);Dry chemical detection LEU,NIT and quantitative culture results were compared, with statistically significant difference (P <0.05 );comparing the joint test results of urinary sediment and dry chemistry with quantitative culture results,no statistically significant difference could be found (P >0.05);The sensitivity,specificity,total compliance rate,positive predictive value and negative predictive value of urine com-bined with dry chemical detection and diagnosis of urinary tract infection were 75.8%,94.7%,87.5%,91.2%, 84.6% respectively.Conclusion:The urine sediments and dry chemical combined detection has a high degree of uniformity with quantization of urine culture results on the urogenital system infection,hereby of important clinical value in the early screening and diagnosis of urogenital system infection.
