CAJ | 학술논문

在政府职能的外包中，关于什么职能可以外包，而什么职能应该由政府履行，一直争论不休。美国行政法上提出了“本质上政府的职能”作为外包的限制。本文梳理了美国法律和政策上关于“本质上政府的职能”的界定。不过，随着时间、思想观念等不同，该职能的界定也不相同，而是需要综合考虑语境才能决定。同时，政府职能的外包也意味着公法价值的在某种程度上的外包。
재정부직능적외포중，관우십요직능가이외포，이십요직능응해유정부리행，일직쟁론불휴。미국행정법상제출료“본질상정부적직능”작위외포적한제。본문소리료미국법률화정책상관우“본질상정부적직능”적계정。불과，수착시간、사상관념등불동，해직능적계정야불상동，이시수요종합고필어경재능결정。동시，정부직능적외포야의미착공법개치적재모충정도상적외포。
In the outsourcing of government function, there exists continuous dispute about what function can be outsourced and what should be carried out by the government itself. Hence the concept of ‘government function in essence’ is promoted as the outsourcing limitation by the American administrative law. This paper summaries its definition in fields of the American law and policy, which varies some under different time background or ideas, needing comprehensive consideration of the context. Meanwhile, the outsourcing of government function also means the outsourcing of public law value in some degree.