中国药业
中國藥業
중국약업
CHINA PHARMACEUTICALS
2014年
24期
50-51,52
,共3页
喻存俊%王峻%徐小峰%戴宏宇%夏春伟%陈文萍
喻存俊%王峻%徐小峰%戴宏宇%夏春偉%陳文萍
유존준%왕준%서소봉%대굉우%하춘위%진문평
非小细胞肺癌%生物免疫疗法%化学治疗%疗效%安全性
非小細胞肺癌%生物免疫療法%化學治療%療效%安全性
비소세포폐암%생물면역요법%화학치료%료효%안전성
non-small-cell lung cancer%DC-CIK%chemotherapy%curative effect%safety
目的:探讨树突状细胞共培养细胞因子诱导的杀伤细胞(DC-CIK)联合单药化学治疗(简称化疗),治疗老年晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的临床疗效和安全性。方法回顾性分析106例具有完整随访资料的老年晚期非小细胞肺癌患者,通过比较单药化疗组(A组)、DC-CIK联合单药化疗组(B组)、DC-CIK治疗组(C组)、最佳支持治疗组(D组)间的客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、疾病进展时间(TTP)及严重不良事件发生率(SSR),评价其临床疗效和安全性。结果4组患者ORR比较有显著性差异,其中A组、B组及C组均显著高于D组( P﹤0.05),但3组间未见明显差异( P﹥0.05)。4组患者DCR有显著性差异,其中B组显著高于其他3组( P﹤0.05)。4组患者TTP比较差异明显( P﹤0.05),其中B组较其他3组明显延长( P﹤0.05)。D组SSR明显低于其余3组,而B组SSR高于C组,但显著低于A组,差异均有统计学意义( P﹤0.05)。结论 DC-CIK生物免疫疗法联合单药化疗能安全、有效地延长老年晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的疾病进展时间。
目的:探討樹突狀細胞共培養細胞因子誘導的殺傷細胞(DC-CIK)聯閤單藥化學治療(簡稱化療),治療老年晚期非小細胞肺癌(NSCLC)的臨床療效和安全性。方法迴顧性分析106例具有完整隨訪資料的老年晚期非小細胞肺癌患者,通過比較單藥化療組(A組)、DC-CIK聯閤單藥化療組(B組)、DC-CIK治療組(C組)、最佳支持治療組(D組)間的客觀緩解率(ORR)、疾病控製率(DCR)、疾病進展時間(TTP)及嚴重不良事件髮生率(SSR),評價其臨床療效和安全性。結果4組患者ORR比較有顯著性差異,其中A組、B組及C組均顯著高于D組( P﹤0.05),但3組間未見明顯差異( P﹥0.05)。4組患者DCR有顯著性差異,其中B組顯著高于其他3組( P﹤0.05)。4組患者TTP比較差異明顯( P﹤0.05),其中B組較其他3組明顯延長( P﹤0.05)。D組SSR明顯低于其餘3組,而B組SSR高于C組,但顯著低于A組,差異均有統計學意義( P﹤0.05)。結論 DC-CIK生物免疫療法聯閤單藥化療能安全、有效地延長老年晚期非小細胞肺癌患者的疾病進展時間。
목적:탐토수돌상세포공배양세포인자유도적살상세포(DC-CIK)연합단약화학치료(간칭화료),치료노년만기비소세포폐암(NSCLC)적림상료효화안전성。방법회고성분석106례구유완정수방자료적노년만기비소세포폐암환자,통과비교단약화료조(A조)、DC-CIK연합단약화료조(B조)、DC-CIK치료조(C조)、최가지지치료조(D조)간적객관완해솔(ORR)、질병공제솔(DCR)、질병진전시간(TTP)급엄중불량사건발생솔(SSR),평개기림상료효화안전성。결과4조환자ORR비교유현저성차이,기중A조、B조급C조균현저고우D조( P﹤0.05),단3조간미견명현차이( P﹥0.05)。4조환자DCR유현저성차이,기중B조현저고우기타3조( P﹤0.05)。4조환자TTP비교차이명현( P﹤0.05),기중B조교기타3조명현연장( P﹤0.05)。D조SSR명현저우기여3조,이B조SSR고우C조,단현저저우A조,차이균유통계학의의( P﹤0.05)。결론 DC-CIK생물면역요법연합단약화료능안전、유효지연장노년만기비소세포폐암환자적질병진전시간。
Objective To investigate clinical effects and safety of dendritic cells co-cultured by cytokine induced killer cells (DC-CIK) combined with mono-chemotherapy in treating elder advanced non-small-cell lung cancer(NSCLC). Methods 106 elderly patients with advanced NSCLC and complete follow-up data were performed the retrospective analysis. The objective response rate (ORR),disease control rate(DCR),time-to-progression(TTP) and severe side-event rate(SSR) were compared among the mono-chemotherapy group(group A),mono-chemotherapy plus DC-CIK group(group B),DC-CIK therapy group(group C)and best support therapy group(D). for evaluating their clinical effect and safety. Results ORR had statistically significant difference among the four groups,which in the group A,B and C was significantly higher than that in the group D( P ﹤ 0. 05),but no obvious differences were found among the group A,B and C( P ﹥ 0. 05). DCR had statistically significant difference among 4 groups,in which the total remis-sion rate in the group B was significantly higher than that in the other 3 groups( P ﹤ 0. 05 ). TTP had significant difference among 4 groups with the statistical significance( P ﹤ 0. 05),which in the group B was significantly extended compared with other 3 groups( P ﹤0. 05). SSR in the group B was significantly lower than that in the other 3 group,but SSR in the group B was higher than that in the group C and lower than that in the group A,the differences all showed the statistical significance( P ﹤ 0. 05). Conclusion DC-CIK combined with mono-chemotherapy can safely and effectively prolong TTP of elderly advanced NSCLC.