临床医药文献电子杂志
臨床醫藥文獻電子雜誌
림상의약문헌전자잡지
Journal of Clinical Medical Literature (ElectronicEdition)
2014年
11期
1993-1994
,共2页
食管癌%术后%快速康复护理
食管癌%術後%快速康複護理
식관암%술후%쾌속강복호리
Esophageal cancer%Surgery%Rapid rehabilitation care
目的:探讨并研究快速康复护理在食管癌手术后的临床应用效果。方法将我科2012年4月~2014年2月期间收治的48例确诊为食管癌的患者作为临床研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为两组,即对照组与试验组行全麻下食管切除术,术后观察病情,并给予一定的常规护理;试验组行全麻下食管切除术,术后观察病情,术后给予患者一定的快速康复护理,对比患者经过2周护理后,对患者的临床护理效果和安全性进行比较。结果试验组的总有效明显高于对照组总有效25.00%,(P<0.05),具有统计学意义;对照组不良反应发生率明显高于试验组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论快速康复护理在食管癌手术后的临床应用效果较为明显,且不良反应发生率低,整体过程安全可靠,患者以及患者家属较为满意,因此值得我们在临床上进行广泛应用。
目的:探討併研究快速康複護理在食管癌手術後的臨床應用效果。方法將我科2012年4月~2014年2月期間收治的48例確診為食管癌的患者作為臨床研究對象,採用隨機數字錶法分為兩組,即對照組與試驗組行全痳下食管切除術,術後觀察病情,併給予一定的常規護理;試驗組行全痳下食管切除術,術後觀察病情,術後給予患者一定的快速康複護理,對比患者經過2週護理後,對患者的臨床護理效果和安全性進行比較。結果試驗組的總有效明顯高于對照組總有效25.00%,(P<0.05),具有統計學意義;對照組不良反應髮生率明顯高于試驗組,差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論快速康複護理在食管癌手術後的臨床應用效果較為明顯,且不良反應髮生率低,整體過程安全可靠,患者以及患者傢屬較為滿意,因此值得我們在臨床上進行廣汎應用。
목적:탐토병연구쾌속강복호리재식관암수술후적림상응용효과。방법장아과2012년4월~2014년2월기간수치적48례학진위식관암적환자작위림상연구대상,채용수궤수자표법분위량조,즉대조조여시험조행전마하식관절제술,술후관찰병정,병급여일정적상규호리;시험조행전마하식관절제술,술후관찰병정,술후급여환자일정적쾌속강복호리,대비환자경과2주호리후,대환자적림상호리효과화안전성진행비교。결과시험조적총유효명현고우대조조총유효25.00%,(P<0.05),구유통계학의의;대조조불량반응발생솔명현고우시험조,차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론쾌속강복호리재식관암수술후적림상응용효과교위명현,차불량반응발생솔저,정체과정안전가고,환자이급환자가속교위만의,인차치득아문재림상상진행엄범응용。
Objective To investigate and study the rapid rehabilitation care in esophageal cancer after surgery clinical effect and safety.Methods Patients admitted to our department from April 2012 to February 2014 during the 100 cases diagnosed with esophageal cancer as a clinical study, divided into two groups by random number table, the control group underwent esophageal resection under general anesthesia, postoperative condition, treated with conventional care; experimental group underwent esophageal resection under general anesthesia, postoperative observation of disease, given the rapid rehabilitation care, compared to two weeks after treatment, the clinical efifcacy and safety of patient care were compared. Results The total effective experimental group was signiifcantly higher total effective 25.00%,P<0.05, statistically signiifcant; adverse reactions occurred in the control group was signiifcantly higher than the experimental group,P<0.05, a statistically signiifcant difference.Conclusion Rapid rehabilitation care in the clinical application of esophageal cancer after surgery is more obvious, and a low incidence of adverse reactions, the overall process is safe, reliable, and patients are more satisifed with their families, so we should be widely used in clinical practice.