CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨重度宫颈糜烂患者的临床护理探析。方法选取2013年11月～2014年11月我院接诊的33例重度宫颈糜烂患者，按照入院的先后顺序分为两组，实验组和对照组，实验组采用综合性护理干预，对照组采用常规护理，观察两组患者的护理效果。结果实验组患者的满意度明显高于对照组，差异显著，有统计学意义（P<0.05）；实验组患者的手术时间、住院时间、不良反应的发生率明显低于对照组，差异显著，有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论综合护理干预对重度宫颈糜烂患者的效果显著，有效提高患者的满意度，缩短手术时间和住院时间，降低不良反应的发生率。
목적：탐토중도궁경미란환자적림상호리탐석。방법선취2013년11월～2014년11월아원접진적33례중도궁경미란환자，안조입원적선후순서분위량조，실험조화대조조，실험조채용종합성호리간예，대조조채용상규호리，관찰량조환자적호리효과。결과실험조환자적만의도명현고우대조조，차이현저，유통계학의의（P<0.05）；실험조환자적수술시간、주원시간、불량반응적발생솔명현저우대조조，차이현저，유통계학의의（P<0.05）。결론종합호리간예대중도궁경미란환자적효과현저，유효제고환자적만의도，축단수술시간화주원시간，강저불량반응적발생솔。
Objective The investigation on clinical nursing of patients with severe cervical erosion is to be discussed. Methods Choose 33 patients with severe cervical erosion who are treated in hospital from November 2013 to November 2014 and separate them into study group and control group according to hospitalization sequence. Patients in study group are given comprehensive nursing intervention,while patients in control group are given conventional treatment,and then observe and compare the treatment efficacy of these two groups. Results Patients’ satisfaction with treatment in study group is much higher than that in control group,there is a treatment differential between the two groups,and such a differential has statistic value(P<0.05). And in addition,surgery time,hospitalization time and side-effect incidence of patients in study group are quite lower than patients in control group,there is a treatment differential between the two groups,and such a differential has statistic value(P<0.05). Conclusion Comprehensive nursing intervention is of efficacy in treatment of patients with severe cervical erosion,and it is conducive to improving patients’satisfaction,reducing surgery time and hospitalization time and side-effect incidence; therefore,such a treatment approach is rather worthwhile to be promoted and applied clinically.