台湾研究集刊
檯灣研究集刊
태만연구집간
TAIWAN RESEARCH QUARTERLY
2014年
6期
86-94
,共9页
台湾文学%后现代主义%历史叙事%反写实主义
檯灣文學%後現代主義%歷史敘事%反寫實主義
태만문학%후현대주의%역사서사%반사실주의
Taiwan literature%postmodernism%historical narrative%anti-realism
台湾在1987年“解严”前后进入了一个文化转型期，彼时威权时代的意识形态统一体已然松动，新的本土主义论述正在集结但尚未占据主导地位。本文以这个时期的台湾后现代思潮及文学创作为研究对象，尤为关注那些以历史书写为主题的小说文本，这些文本以语言反省与形式解构为起点，反叛写实主义的美学观，质疑本质主义的历史真实观，不仅挑战前行代的美学主张，也解构逐渐凝聚为新威权话语的本土论述。通过对文本的审美形态及其意识形态表征的分析，本文试图指出，出现于上世纪八九十年代之交的台湾后现代历史叙事文本是一种对意识形态统一体的松动非常敏感且及时作出反应的话语，是意识形态统一体松动后文化危机和思想危机的表征，这些文本以瓦解历史的方式传达出特定的历史意识。
檯灣在1987年“解嚴”前後進入瞭一箇文化轉型期，彼時威權時代的意識形態統一體已然鬆動，新的本土主義論述正在集結但尚未佔據主導地位。本文以這箇時期的檯灣後現代思潮及文學創作為研究對象，尤為關註那些以歷史書寫為主題的小說文本，這些文本以語言反省與形式解構為起點，反叛寫實主義的美學觀，質疑本質主義的歷史真實觀，不僅挑戰前行代的美學主張，也解構逐漸凝聚為新威權話語的本土論述。通過對文本的審美形態及其意識形態錶徵的分析，本文試圖指齣，齣現于上世紀八九十年代之交的檯灣後現代歷史敘事文本是一種對意識形態統一體的鬆動非常敏感且及時作齣反應的話語，是意識形態統一體鬆動後文化危機和思想危機的錶徵，這些文本以瓦解歷史的方式傳達齣特定的歷史意識。
태만재1987년“해엄”전후진입료일개문화전형기，피시위권시대적의식형태통일체이연송동，신적본토주의논술정재집결단상미점거주도지위。본문이저개시기적태만후현대사조급문학창작위연구대상，우위관주나사이역사서사위주제적소설문본，저사문본이어언반성여형식해구위기점，반반사실주의적미학관，질의본질주의적역사진실관，불부도전전행대적미학주장，야해구축점응취위신위권화어적본토논술。통과대문본적심미형태급기의식형태표정적분석，본문시도지출，출현우상세기팔구십년대지교적태만후현대역사서사문본시일충대의식형태통일체적송동비상민감차급시작출반응적화어，시의식형태통일체송동후문화위궤화사상위궤적표정，저사문본이와해역사적방식전체출특정적역사의식。
Taiwan entered upon a cultural transformation period in 1987 when martial law was declared ended. That was a time when the ideological unity in the authoritarian era had loosened while the new nativist discourse was gathering yet not be-came dominant. Taking the postmodern trend of thought and literature creation in Taiwan during that period of time as the re-search object, this paper focuses on the novel texts of historical writing which, with language reflection and its form deconstruc-tion as the starting point and the aesthetics of rebellious realism, question the historical authenticity of essentialism. This not only issues a challenge to the aesthetic proposition of their seniors, but also deconstructs the nativist discourse that has gradual-ly condensed to form a new authoritarian discourse. Based on the analysis of the aesthetic and ideological characteristics of the texts, this paper argues that the postmodern historical narrative texts in Taiwan which emerged between the 1980s and 1990s of the 20th century, is a discourse which is very sensitive to the looseness of the ideological unity and gives a timely response to it. And it is also the superficial characteristics of the cultural and ideological crisis after the looseness of the ideological unity. The texts, the writer believes, convey specific historical consciousness in a way of disintegration of history,.
