广州医科大学学报
廣州醫科大學學報
엄주의과대학학보
Academic Journal of Guangzhou Medical College
2014年
4期
122-124
,共3页
溃疡,穿孔%穿孔修补术%腹腔镜术
潰瘍,穿孔%穿孔脩補術%腹腔鏡術
궤양,천공%천공수보술%복강경술
perforation,peptic ulcer%repair operation%laparoscopy
目的:探讨腹腔镜技术在消化性溃疡穿孔治疗中的应用价值。方法:对应用腹腔镜技术治疗消化性溃疡穿孔的患者(观察组)及开腹手术的患者(对照组)的临床资料进行分析,并对两组治疗效果进行对比。结果:两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后排气时间、术后下床活动时间、切口大小、术后切口感染及住院时间等指标比较,差异有统计学意义( P<0.05)。所有患者获得有效随访,随访时间3~28个月,术后未见明显并发症。结论:应用腹腔镜技术治疗消化性溃疡穿孔安全可靠,创伤小,出血少,恢复快,并发症少,住院时间短,是一种理想的手术方法,效果满意。
目的:探討腹腔鏡技術在消化性潰瘍穿孔治療中的應用價值。方法:對應用腹腔鏡技術治療消化性潰瘍穿孔的患者(觀察組)及開腹手術的患者(對照組)的臨床資料進行分析,併對兩組治療效果進行對比。結果:兩組患者手術時間、術中齣血量、術後排氣時間、術後下床活動時間、切口大小、術後切口感染及住院時間等指標比較,差異有統計學意義( P<0.05)。所有患者穫得有效隨訪,隨訪時間3~28箇月,術後未見明顯併髮癥。結論:應用腹腔鏡技術治療消化性潰瘍穿孔安全可靠,創傷小,齣血少,恢複快,併髮癥少,住院時間短,是一種理想的手術方法,效果滿意。
목적:탐토복강경기술재소화성궤양천공치료중적응용개치。방법:대응용복강경기술치료소화성궤양천공적환자(관찰조)급개복수술적환자(대조조)적림상자료진행분석,병대량조치료효과진행대비。결과:량조환자수술시간、술중출혈량、술후배기시간、술후하상활동시간、절구대소、술후절구감염급주원시간등지표비교,차이유통계학의의( P<0.05)。소유환자획득유효수방,수방시간3~28개월,술후미견명현병발증。결론:응용복강경기술치료소화성궤양천공안전가고,창상소,출혈소,회복쾌,병발증소,주원시간단,시일충이상적수술방법,효과만의。
Objective:To investigate the application value of Laparoscopic technique in the treatment of peptic ulcer perforation.Methods:Clinical data of patients with peptic ulcer perforation treated by Laparoscopic technique ( observation group) and laparotomy ( control group) were analyzed. And the treatment outcomes of the two groups were compared. Results:There were statistical significance of operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative exhaust time, postoperative activity time, incision size, postoperative infection and length of stay, and other indicators between the two groups ( P<0.05) . All the patients obtained effective follow-up visit from 3 to 28 months, and there was no significant complication after the operation. Conclusion:The application of Laparoscopic technique in the treatment of peptic ulcer perforation is safe and reliable, which has minimal trauma, less bleeding, quick recovery, less complication, short hospitalization time. It is an ideal operation method with satisfactory effect.