检验医学与临床
檢驗醫學與臨床
검험의학여림상
JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE AND CLINICAL SCIENCES
2015年
2期
164-165,168
,共3页
孟凡萍%郝坡%王长本%杜红心
孟凡萍%郝坡%王長本%杜紅心
맹범평%학파%왕장본%두홍심
2型糖尿病%血小板-中性粒细胞聚集体%血小板-单核细胞聚集体%ROC曲线
2型糖尿病%血小闆-中性粒細胞聚集體%血小闆-單覈細胞聚集體%ROC麯線
2형당뇨병%혈소판-중성립세포취집체%혈소판-단핵세포취집체%ROC곡선
PMA%PNA%type 2 diabetes mellitus%ROC curves
目的:探讨血小板‐中性粒细胞聚集体(PNA)、血小板‐单核细胞聚集体(PMA)检测在预测2型糖尿病并发症中的实用价值。方法应用流式细胞仪检测2型糖尿病并发肾病变患者血浆的 PM A、PNA ,并以无并发症的2型糖尿病患者和健康人作为对照,比较上述三组PM A、PN A的水平,用ROC曲线评价此试验的临床应用价值。结果2型糖尿病并发肾病变组PMA、PNA水平显著高于无并发症组,而后者又显著高于健康对照。ROC曲线显示,PM A对2型糖尿病患者并发肾病变诊断临界值灵敏度为96.7%,特异性为100.0%,截断点为40.12%;PNA灵敏度为96.7%,特异性为88.3%,截断点为26.98%,可见PMA优于 PNA。曲线下面积分别为0.986和0.963。结论 PMA、PNA可以预测2型糖尿病肾病变,应用流式细胞法检测其灵敏度和特异性均较满意,PMA特异性优于PN A。
目的:探討血小闆‐中性粒細胞聚集體(PNA)、血小闆‐單覈細胞聚集體(PMA)檢測在預測2型糖尿病併髮癥中的實用價值。方法應用流式細胞儀檢測2型糖尿病併髮腎病變患者血漿的 PM A、PNA ,併以無併髮癥的2型糖尿病患者和健康人作為對照,比較上述三組PM A、PN A的水平,用ROC麯線評價此試驗的臨床應用價值。結果2型糖尿病併髮腎病變組PMA、PNA水平顯著高于無併髮癥組,而後者又顯著高于健康對照。ROC麯線顯示,PM A對2型糖尿病患者併髮腎病變診斷臨界值靈敏度為96.7%,特異性為100.0%,截斷點為40.12%;PNA靈敏度為96.7%,特異性為88.3%,截斷點為26.98%,可見PMA優于 PNA。麯線下麵積分彆為0.986和0.963。結論 PMA、PNA可以預測2型糖尿病腎病變,應用流式細胞法檢測其靈敏度和特異性均較滿意,PMA特異性優于PN A。
목적:탐토혈소판‐중성립세포취집체(PNA)、혈소판‐단핵세포취집체(PMA)검측재예측2형당뇨병병발증중적실용개치。방법응용류식세포의검측2형당뇨병병발신병변환자혈장적 PM A、PNA ,병이무병발증적2형당뇨병환자화건강인작위대조,비교상술삼조PM A、PN A적수평,용ROC곡선평개차시험적림상응용개치。결과2형당뇨병병발신병변조PMA、PNA수평현저고우무병발증조,이후자우현저고우건강대조。ROC곡선현시,PM A대2형당뇨병환자병발신병변진단림계치령민도위96.7%,특이성위100.0%,절단점위40.12%;PNA령민도위96.7%,특이성위88.3%,절단점위26.98%,가견PMA우우 PNA。곡선하면적분별위0.986화0.963。결론 PMA、PNA가이예측2형당뇨병신병변,응용류식세포법검측기령민도화특이성균교만의,PMA특이성우우PN A。
Objective To evaluate the practical value of the platelet‐monocyte aggregates(PMA) and platelet‐neutrophils aggregates (PNA ) detection in predicting the complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM ) . Methods Plasma PMA and PNA were detected in 90 cases of T2DM complicating nephropathy ,30 cases of T2DM without complications and 30 healthy persons as the control .The PMA and PNA levels were compared among 3 groups and the clinical application value of this experiment was evaluated by the ROC curves .Results The plasma PMA and PNA levels in the T2DM complicating nephropathy were significantly higher than that in the T2DM with‐out complications group ,and which in the latter were significantly higher than those in the healthy controls .The ROC curves indicated that the critical values of PMA for diagnosing T2DM complicating nephropathy were the sensitivity of 96 .7% ,specificity of 100 .0% and cut off point of 40 .12% ,which of PNA were the sensitivity of 96 .7% ,specifici‐ty of 88 .3% and cut off point of 26 .98% ,showing that PMA was superior to PNA .The area under the curve(AUC) was 0 .986 and 0 .963 respectively .Conclusion PMA and PNA can be used to predict the complicating renal lesion inT2DM ,the sensitivity and specificity by using the flow cytometry for detecting PNA and PM A are more satisfacto‐ry ,but the specificity of PM A is better than that of PNA .