CAJ | 학술논문

高等教育管理领域有三个经典的组织模型，分别是科层模型、学院模型和政治模型。学院模型在共同治理理念下分析校内共同参与遴选过程具有解释力；科层模型则可用于分析威权治理模式中董事会把遴选作为自身决策事务的遴选特征；而政治模型在解释当前美国公立大学校长遴选工作上具有更大的解释效力。本文以佛罗里达大学2003年校长遴选为案例，分析州治理制度变化、州政治气候以及校内群体博弈对当时校长遴选过程和结构的影响。鉴于大量遴选失败案例，有必要对共同治理传统、公立大学董事会制度和《阳光法案》的影响等进行重新审视并采取果断行动，让州立大学重回为公共利益服务的轨道，走出政治化泥沼。
고등교육관리영역유삼개경전적조직모형，분별시과층모형、학원모형화정치모형。학원모형재공동치리이념하분석교내공동삼여린선과정구유해석력；과층모형칙가용우분석위권치리모식중동사회파린선작위자신결책사무적린선특정；이정치모형재해석당전미국공립대학교장린선공작상구유경대적해석효력。본문이불라리체대학2003년교장린선위안례，분석주치리제도변화、주정치기후이급교내군체박혁대당시교장린선과정화결구적영향。감우대량린선실패안례，유필요대공동치리전통、공립대학동사회제도화《양광법안》적영향등진행중신심시병채취과단행동，양주립대학중회위공공이익복무적궤도，주출정치화니소。
There are three classical organizational models in the filed of higher education administration, including bureaucratic model, collegial model and political model. The collegial model has explanatory power in exploring the participation in presidential search based on the notion of shared governance. The bureaucratic model is often used to analyze presidential search based on the authoritarian model in which board of regents takes it as an internal affair. The political model has more explanatory power in explaining university presidential search in modern public universities. This article conducts a case study of the University of Florida to explore the key factors influencing presidential search, including the change of political climate, the institution of governance, and the game between interest groups. Due to so many failed cases, it is necessary to reflect on shared governance, the system of board of regents and the Sunshine Act, and to take steps to make public universities away from politics and contribute to the public interest.